Cover Image: July 2009 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

Space Geology: From the Moon to Mars [Preview]

The only scientist and field geologist ever to visit the moon offers some pointers to those who will one day visit Mars















Share on Tumblr



Using a specially designed metal scoop, the author took soil samples from the floor of Camelot Crater on December 12, 1972. Human geologists may one day do the same on Mars; in the meantime, they rely on robot proxies such as Mars Pathfinder, which explored Ares Vallis in 1997. Image: Photoillustration by Scientific American; Courtesy of NASA (moon and Mars)

In Brief

  • The Apollo lunar exploration that began 40 years ago was not done primarily for science, but science nonetheless benefited hugely. The astronauts collected samples and took measurements that narrowed hypotheses of the moon’s origin and provided a point of comparison for observations of other planets.
  • On the final moon shot, Apollo 17 in December 1972, the author became the only scientist ever to visit the moon. As he describes here, lunar exploration proved to be similar to geologic field­work on Earth. He learned to mentally disentangle the effects of meteor impacts to see the underlying rock types. But it was tricky to judge distance in the alien landscape, and stiff spacesuit gloves limited how fast he could work.
  • Similar issues will arise on Mars missions.

Forty years ago this month the lunar surface reverberated with life for the first time. Forty years from now will Mars, too, come alive? President Barack Obama has affirmed the broad goals for human spaceflight that his predecessor put forward in 2004: retire the shuttle in 2010, develop a replacement line of rockets (named Ares), return to the moon by 2020, and go to Mars, perhaps in the mid-2030s [see “To the Moon and Beyond,” by Charles Dingell, William A. Johns and Julie Kramer White; Scientific American, October 2007]. The program is known as Constellation.

For now, policy makers are worried less about Mars than about the downtime between the last shuttle launch and first Ares flight, during which the U.S. will depend on Russia or private companies to launch its astronauts into orbit. What was originally supposed to be a two-year gap has widened to six, and in May the Obama administration announced that former aerospace executive Norman Augustine will lead a review of the program to see how it might get back on track.


This article was originally published with the title From the Moon to Mars.



Subscribe     Buy This Issue

Already a Digital subscriber? Sign-in Now
If your institution has site license access, enter here.

6 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. alphachapmtl 05:35 AM 6/15/09

    "Forty years ago this month..."
    -- It seems we've been going backward since then.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. frgough 01:28 PM 6/16/09

    People fighting to suckle the teat of the state are incapable of doing great things.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. Quinn the Eskimo 01:27 AM 6/18/09

    The best you can do today is Low Earth Orbit and a crap-shoot re-entry! Progress.

    NASA -- Never Another Space Adventure

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. MOM 12:58 PM 7/11/09

    I had a question on this article which I thought would be beneficial if you could expand on. Why would you see objects further than they really are if the amount of air lacks?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. MOM 01:00 PM 7/11/09

    I don't figure why lack of air causes illusion of eyes.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. Mariel141 04:49 PM 6/20/11

    To MOM or anyone else wondering about seeing without air:

    The illusion is probably due to the lack of aerial perspective. This is a term that refers to the way humidity and impurities in the air obscure our vision over distances. It's why, if you look out over several forested hills, the ones farthest away have a bluer tint and less contrast than the nearer ones. Our eyes automatically use this to judge distance, but in an environment without air or landmarks of scale, it could be very difficult.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Email this Article

Space Geology: From the Moon to Mars: Scientific American Magazine

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X