Space scope finds scorched super-Earth

Kepler's latest discovery is step closer to a true Earth analogue.


Nature













Share on Tumblr

Space scope finds scorched super-Earth

Space scope finds scorched super-Earth Image:

By Adam Mann

Kepler, the space telescope considered most likely over the next few years to identify an Earth-like planet orbiting another star, has struck solid ground, mission scientists say.

Most of the hundreds of extrasolar planets discovered to date--including the eight previously reported by Kepler--are at least as large as Neptune and are mainly gas giants. But astronomers hope that the mission will eventually yield a trove of terrestrial planets, including some orbiting their stars at a distance that would allow their surfaces to host liquid water, and possibly life.

Now the team is a step nearer to that goal. It has found a Sun-like star 173 parsecs away--relatively close by galactic standards--harboring a planet that is just 40 percent larger than Earth, although it is uninhabitably hot. Supporting measurements of the planet's mass, gathered at the Keck Observatory on Mauna Kea, Hawaii, suggest that the planet's density is 1.6 times that of Earth, implying a rocky composition. Although other telescopes have already spotted a handful of similar "super-Earths," the first confirmed rocky planet to fall within Kepler's sights is an encouraging sign for the mission.

"It's a milestone," says co-investigator Natalie Batalha, an astronomer at San José State University in California, who unveiled news of the discovery during a talk on January 10 at the American Astronomical Society's annual meeting in Seattle, Wash.

Launched by NASA in 2009, Kepler's strategy is to point at a patch of sky in the plane of the Milky Way, where it can continuously monitor more than 100,000 stars, and to look for slight, periodic changes in their luminosity. Such dips in brightness often indicate the presence of planets repeatedly crossing in front of the stars they orbit. So far, after barely a year of observations, Kepler is limited to detecting short-period planets, those close to their stars.

The new-found planet orbits its star--designated Kepler 10--every 20 hours, at a distance of 2.5 million kilometers. This is less than 2 percent of the distance separating Earth and the Sun, ensuring that the planet is more "terra lava" than terra firma, with a surface temperature of 1,800 degrees C, hot enough to melt silicate rock.

Astronomers at Keck were able to monitor how the planet tugs on the star, giving them its mass. Meanwhile, because the star is nearer than most of the stars in Kepler's search field, the Kepler team could record tiny variations in the star's luminosity due to sound waves rippling through its interior. The timing of these acoustic oscillations provided detailed information about the star's dimensions, much as the sound of a string on a bow reveals whether the instrument being played is a violin or a cello.

"Everything we measure about the planet is relative to the parent star," says Batalha. Armed with a precise figure for the star's diameter, she and her colleagues were able to nail down the planet's dimensions with similar precision.

The planet's close orbit is similar to that of another rocky exoplanet, CoRoT-7b, discovered in 2009, says Greg Laughlin, an astronomer at the University of California, Santa Cruz, who was not involved in the work. He says the result shows how far astronomers' techniques for finding exo¬planets of Earth-like proportions have advanced in recent years. "No one would have thought a decade ago that we'd be finding these ultra-hot rocky super-Earths," says Laughlin. Their existence suggests that cooler, smaller worlds await discovery as Kepler's monitoring time increases and it can identify planets in longer, more distant orbits, he adds.

In February, the Kepler mission is expected to release data on 400 additional planetary candidates. The team is excited, says Batalha, because it hopes that Kepler's growing number of detections will offer the first concrete estimates of the frequency of extrasolar planets--rocky and otherwise. "So far, it's been a deluge," says Batalha. "And we look forward to finding a lot more planets."


Nature

3 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. rikkus 04:21 AM 1/11/11

    This 'energy poll' that now comes up when you visit the site is very annoying.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. letxequalx 07:18 AM 1/11/11

    Let's get some plasma drives up and running and get some probes out there to look at extrasolar planets. I know that I won't live to see any data come in but I would feel better just knowing that the knowledge was forthcoming, that the checkreally was in the mail.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. jack.123 05:10 AM 1/14/11

    I understand the notion the unless you have experimental data something doesn't excist but with billions of stars in billions of galaxies the notion that earths are not out there unless we see them is observed.I will say it once again if someone is out there we will detect them the by the reaction of the starlight that they are looking at,much like changing the outcome of a experiment here on Earth by just looking at it.As our own looking at starlight will tell others out there that there is somebody here looking.There may even be the possibility of instantaneous communication using entanglement.Who knows as our ability to detect increases such things may become possible.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Space scope finds scorched super-Earth

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X