Just sprinkle on and harvest light — that is the procedure with nanoscale cubes of silver that could be used to make efficient solar panels, heat detectors and specialist cameras.

The cubes are scattered randomly on a piece of polymer-coated metal to form a device that absorbs nearly all the light that hits it. Unlike other light absorbers, it is relatively simple and cheap to make, and could be produced on a large scale for industrial and even domestic applications.

The material, which can be tuned to ensnare the desired wavelength of light, is described today in Nature. It was developed by David Smith, a materials scientist at Duke University in Durham, North Carolina, and his colleagues.

Trapped in a gap
Absorbers that can capture all, or almost all, of the light that hits them are typically made with metamaterials — materials engineered to have particular properties not found in nature. They usually have precisely placed components smaller than the wavelength of light, which gives them the ability to manipulate light in weird ways (see 'Ideal focus').

These minuscule components are painstakingly fabricated in a laborious, expensive etching process using lithography, so the light absorbers are difficult to make in large quantities.

Smith and his team took a different approach. They mounted a thin piece of gold on a piece of glass, and dipped it into two organic chemicals to build a uniform polymer layer just a few nanometers thick on top of the gold. They then made silver cubes about 74 nanometers wide, and scattered them on top of the polymer.

When light with a certain wavelength hits a nanocube in the device, it excites the cube’s electrons, which start to oscillate together with the electrons in the gold film. This 'plasmon resonance' between film and nanocube seems to pull light into the insulating polymer gap between them, and traps it there, explains Smith.

Different wavelengths
The thickness of the polymer is crucial — it determines the wavelength of light that is gathered. Different polymer thicknesses in an array of combined devices could absorb between them a broad range of light wavelengths.

Smith says that his device works just as well as etched systems, and is easier to make.

“It’s time consuming to make a very large structure” using lithography, agrees Min Qiu, who works on similar systems at the Royal Institute of Technology in Kista, Sweden. A square of etched light absorber 100 micrometers across takes up to an hour to prepare, he says, and a patch 1 millimeter across would take up to 100 times longer.

Smith’s system is potentially easier to prepare on large scales, says Qiu. However, before it can be used practically, the team must find a way to make all the nanocubes the same size; they currently vary slightly.

Smith is also looking at using different materials to form the insulating gap, because organic polymers might not be suitable for high-temperature applications, he says.

The method could help to make metamaterials much more practical, says Junpeng Guo, who works on nanophotonics at the University of Alabama in Huntsville. “This brings the technology to ordinary people’s lives,” he says. For example, the nanocube absorber could be used to make solar-powered rooftop water heaters more efficient.

This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on December 5, 2012.

3 Comments

1. 1. Carlyle 05:44 AM 12/6/12

   As I have said on numerous previous occasions, no matter what you do, you can not capture more energy per m2 than is contained in that sunlight. What is the point of building devices that raise the efficiency by a few percent per metre2 unless the cost & durability improves the $ per kilowatt ratio. If the efficiency was lowered by 50% but the $ per kilowatt ratio was higher, in most cases that is a better result.

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

2. 2. Carlyle 07:58 AM 12/6/12

   Further to the above, thirty years ago I had a factory producing solar hot water heaters. I used an electroplating process to deposit black crome oxide on the collectors. It was very efective & was at minimal cost. I believe this system is still used today.

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

3. 3. hurlements in reply to Carlyle 04:06 AM 12/7/12

   Actually, it is unlikely the cubes will be able to make better solar panels. As you said, if your goal is really to absorb all the incoming light, there are other, simpler methods...

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this