Cover Image: May 2002 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

Survival in an Insecure World [Preview]

To defeat cyberterrorists, computer systems must be designed to work around sabotage. David A. Fisher's new programming language will help do just that















Share on Tumblr

DAVID A. FISHER: PROGRAMMING PIONEER " data-pin-do="buttonBookmark">

DAVID A. FISHER: PROGRAMMING PIONEER

  • Ten years ago, hiked the entire Appalachian Trail in 180 days.
  • First job: programming multiprocessor mainframes in 1965 at Burroughs.
  • "We'll never see another plane hijacked and crashed into a building, because passengers now will sacrifice themselves if necessary to thwart it. That's an example of an emergent algorithm that contributes to survivability."
Image: STEVE MELLON

As one of the primary lines of defense against hackers, cyberterrorists and other online malefactors, the CERT Coordination Center at Carnegie Mellon University is a natural target. So like many high-profile organizations, it beefed up its security measures after September's audacious terrorist attacks. Before I can enter the glass and steel building, I have to state my business to an intercom and smile for the camera at the front door. Then I must sign my name in front of two uniformed guards and wait for an escort who can swipe her scan card through a reader (surveilled by another camera) to admit me to the "classified" area. But these barriers--just like the patting down I endured at the airport and like the series of passwords I must type to boot up my laptop--create more of an illusion of security than actual security. In an open society, after all, perfect security is an impossible dream.

That is particularly true of computer systems, which are rapidly growing more complicated, interdependent, indispensable--and easier to hack. The tapestries of machines that control transportation, banking, the power grid and virtually anything connected to the Internet are all unbounded systems, observes CERT researcher David A. Fisher: "No one, not even the owner, has complete and precise knowledge of the topology or state of the system. Central control is nonexistent or ineffective."


This article was originally published with the title Survival in an Insecure World.



Subscribe     Buy This Issue

Already a Digital subscriber? Sign-in Now
If your institution has site license access, enter here.

Comments

Add Comment
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Survival in an Insecure World: Scientific American Magazine

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X