Cliff swallows' wings may be getting shorter to increase agility—and the odds of avoiding cars.
Image: Glenn Bartley/All Canada Photos/Corbis
-
Why Is the Penis Shaped Like That?
Why do testicles hang the way they do? Is there an adaptive function to the female orgasm? What does it feel like to want to kill yourself? Does “free will”...
Read More »
Roadside-nesting cliff swallows have evolved shorter, more maneuverable wings, which may have helped them to make hasty retreats from oncoming vehicles, according to a study published in Current Biology.
The study’s authors discovered the trend after noticing that the number of vehicle-killed birds had declined over the past three decades. They suggest that the two findings provide evidence of roadway-related adaptation.
“I’m not saying that it’s all because of wing length,” says Charles Brown, a biologist at the University of Tulsa in Oklahoma and one of the authors of the study. But, he says, the shortening does support the idea that the birds are adapting to disturbed environments, as other organisms presumably are.
Together with Mary Bomberger Brown, a ornithologist at the University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Brown tracked roadside populations of cliff swallows (Petrochelidon pyrrhonota) in western Nebraska for 30 years, mostly to study the birds social behaviors within their colonies.
These birds winter in South America but breed in North America, in colonies of up to 12,000 adults. They typically build their conical, mud-based nests into the sides of cliffs, but have also taken to living under bridges and highway overpasses.
As the two researchers checked the roadside colonies, Brown, an amateur taxidermist, collected dead swallows for skinning and stuffing — gathering 104 vehicle-killed adults and 134 adults killed accidentally in nets used for the study. When he and Bomberger Brown noticed a decline in the annual number of roadkills — even though the overall population was increasing — they compared the wing measurements of both types of stuffed bird.
The team discovered that vehicle-killed birds had longer wings than birds that died in nets, and that while the wings of the vehicle-killed birds had lengthened over time, those of net-killed birds — which represented the general population — had shortened.
Escape strategy
Brown says that there is evidence that shorter wings make the animals more agile: “they can make a 90º turn more rapidly”, he says. That would help the birds to dodge traffic as they exit or enter their nesting sites, or take off from the pavement, Brown explains. And that in turn would enable them to survive and produce more short-winged offspring.
The researchers tried to rule out other factors that might have explained the decline in roadkill — including changes in methods to find the animals, traffic patterns, predators, diseases and scavengers — but acknowledge that it might have been caused by behavioral changes, such as the birds learning to avoid cars.
Taxidermist Johannes Erritzoe at the House of Birdresearch in Christiansfeld, Denmark, has also noticed a decline in the number vehicle-killed birds around Denmark, and suspects natural selection. Although he has not yet measured wing length, he says that he now plans to do so.
It is hard to definitely prove that animals are adapting to living around roads, says behavioral ecologist Colleen St. Clair at the University of Alberta in Edmonton, Canada. But, she says “this is the best demonstration that they do have that capacity”.
This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on March 18, 2013.
See what we're tweeting about
6 Comments
Add CommentSee, length does matter.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisFascinating to read that animals are possibly evolving in response to anthropogenic habitats .
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisBut why were so many killed accidentally in nets? In the UK at least, it is policy to monitor mist nets and remove birds from them as soon as possible. What happened here?
I like how this article gives the idea and the evidence but doesn't overstate it, or misrepresent the science, while still being interesting.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisIt's very well-written :)
I'm fascinated by these reports of rapid changes in morphology/behaviour in response to extreme novel stressors. It reminds me of the anecdotal reports that rattlesnakes are less inclined to "sound-off" in recent years in response to the pressure placed on them by roundups and feral hogs. Snakes that are reluctant to rattle are arguably less inclined to be discovered by people/pigs.Interesting stuff.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisRe: "The researchers tried to rule out other factors that might have explained the decline in roadkill — including changes in methods to find the animals, traffic patterns, predators, diseases and scavengers — but acknowledge that it might have been caused by behavioral changes, such as the birds learning to avoid cars."
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisThat would seem to me the most reasonable explanation.
Such "adaptation," over a period of 30 years, would seem to be exceptionally rapid even for punk-eke.
A ridiculous story. These swallows have not evolved to dodge traffic. Utter nonsense. That's not how evolution works - there's no intention to it, no purpose, no "to" to it. If the swallows have evolved shorter wings and have become more agile flyers, and I see no reason to doubt that they have, it's because there's been a differential reproductive success of the shorter-winged, more agile individuals.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisSadly, this isn't the first time that Scientific American has published articles presenting the idea that evolution is intentional and directed. Which is not only wrong, it provides ammunition to the naysayers who claim that there's a motivating intelligence working behind the scenes.