The Diet That Fits

Analyzing metabolism for personalized nutrition















Share on Tumblr



TIME TO LOSE WEIGHT? Image: Photo by Byrmo via Flickr

No single diet works for everyone. Some people can slurp cabbage soup for a week and lose only a few ounces, while others on the same spartan regimen lose 10 pounds. But what if you could measure your metabolism and get a prescription for a customized diet?

Metabonomics may do just that. It is one of the latest offshoots of the "-omics" revolution--after genomics (genes) and proteomics (proteins). With the understanding that some diseases such as obesity are metabolic syndromes in which multiple biochemical pathways interact to cause complex symptoms, metabolic testing offers a way to gauge health over a lifetime. What is more, metabonomic technology might identify disorders before they produce symptoms. Such testing could help people choose diet and exercise regimens that are tailored to their individual metabolic states.

Alan J. Higgins of Icoria, a company based in Research Triangle Park, N.C., that is applying its metabonomic technology to human health, explains that "metabono-mics gives you the functional component" that is not always evident from a genetic or protein analysis. Changes in gene expression do not necessarily affect health, because the body's homeostatic mechanisms may compensate. Moreover, genes and proteins interact and only sometimes cause net changes in metabolic pathways. Metabonomics attempts to unify genomics and proteomics by examining an organism as a system. "We pick up those changes on the downstream end," Higgins adds.

At any given moment, the human body excretes thousands of metabolites that can be measured in urine, plasma and various body tissues. Conventional technology such as mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance can measure such components--that is how biochemists test the toxicity of drugs or environmental pollutants on human cells. The challenge, however, has been interpreting the reams of data generated. The bioinformatics boom has helped solve that problem. Scientists can now analyze metabolites in greater detail and also conduct more informative comparative studies. For example, three years ago London-based Metabometrix demonstrated that high-frequency radio waves bounced off a blood sample could identify atherosclerosis. The radio waves measure the sample's magnetic properties, and computer software generates a telltale pattern.

Profiling metabolic disease before symptoms appear may also be possible. Researchers at BG Medicine, based in Waltham, Mass., examined mice genetically engineered to develop atherosclerosis if placed on a high-fat diet. Scientists fed the mice a moderate-fat diet and after nine weeks measured lipid molecules in their livers and plasma. Compared with levels in a control group, certain lipid metabolites were elevated in the transgenic mice, even though they appeared perfectly healthy.

Of course, biochemical markers that flag disease, such as high cholesterol, already exist, but they are not sufficient. "A single biomarker gives information," says Jan van der Greef of BG Medicine, "but typically biomarker patterns are necessary to tell the complete story." Van der Greef suspects that many diseases have metabolic signatures that technology can detect even before a marker such as cholesterol would be elevated--the challenge is to identify the patterns. That is no small task: there is not yet a clear understanding of normal human metabolism, let alone abnormal metabolism.

Relatively speaking, "gene sequencing is so easy," says José M. Ordovas, director of the Nutrition and Genomics Laboratory at Tufts University. He notes that sequencers have to cope with only four components (A, C, T and G), whereas "in metabonomics you have different [technology] platforms that measure things in different ways. We are talking about thousands of components."

To move forward, scientists would like to see a human metabonome established--an equivalent of the human genome for metabolism. But the field lacks coordination and money, says Ordovas, who estimates that it might take analyses of half a million people or more to accomplish the task.�



Comments

Add Comment
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

The Diet That Fits

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X