Cover Image: September 2011 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

The Eyes Have It

Eye gaze is critically important to social primates such as humans. Maybe that is why illusions involving eyes are so compelling














Share on Tumblr

SEEING DOUBLE?
What if you duplicate some of the features of a portrait without overlapping them completely? It is relatively easy to create images in Photoshop in which the eyes and the mouth, but no other facial features, have been doubled. The results are little short of mind-bending: as the brain struggles (and fails) to fuse the doubled-up features, the photograph appears unstable and wobbly, and observers experience something akin to double vision.

The neural mechanisms for this illusion may lie within our visual system’s specialized circuits for face perception. If you double up the eyes and mouths in a portrait, the neurons in the face-recognition areas of the brain may not be able to process this visual information correctly. Such failure could make the faces unsteady and difficult to perceive.

THE IRIS ILLUSION
This illusion, by vision scientists Jisien Yang and Adrian Schwaninger of the Visual Cognition Research Group at the University of Zurich, was one of the top 10 finalists in the 2008 Best Illusion of the Year Contest. It shows that context, such as the shape of the eyelids and face, affects the apparent distance between the irises. Consider the pair of Asian faces shown here: the distance between the left eye of the right face and the right eye of the left face seems short. In the Caucasian faces, the separation looks wider. Notice the reconstructions of the eyes and irises below each face: without the context of the face and eyelid shapes, it is clear that the irises are equally spaced. Visit http://illusioncontest.neuralcorrelate.com/2008/yangs-iris-illusion for more details.

HERE’S LOOKIN’ AT YOU, KID
Vision researcher Pawan Sinha of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology shows us with this illusion that our brains have specialized mechanisms for determining gaze direction. In the normal photograph of Humphrey Bogart (left), the actor appears to be looking to his left, but in the photo negative (right) he appears to be looking in the opposite direction. Yet Bogart’s face does not look backward; only the eyes are reversed. Why? The answer is that we have specialized modules in our brain that determine gaze direction by comparing the dark parts of the eyes (the irises and pupils) with the whites. When the face is negative, the whites and irises appear to swap position. Our knowledge that irises are light rather than dark in a negative does not change our perception of this illusion.


This article was originally published with the title The Eyes Have It.



Buy This Issue
If your institution has site license access, enter here.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR(S)

SUSANA MARTINEZ-CONDE and STEPHEN L. MACKNIK are laboratory directors at the Barrow Neurological Institute in Phoenix. They are authors of the book Sleights of Mind: What the Neuroscience of Magic Reveals about Our Everyday Deceptions, with Sandra Blakeslee (http://sleightsofmind.com) (Henry Holt, 2010).


3 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. Mike W. 12:45 PM 9/14/11

    Last illusion isn't working for me. They do look like they're gazing in different directions but only slightly. Real colour pic he's looking right and a bit down. Negative colour pic he's looking more straight ahead (relative to his head) and up a bit.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. Squeedle 04:35 PM 9/14/11

    Maybe I'm seeing things (ha), but, I took my pixel ruler and measured the distances between the eyes in the Asian vs. Caucasian eyes, and measured a wider distance between the center set of eyes, by a full 1mm. The drawn pairs of eyes under each photo also don't line up with the eyes above them.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. jgrosay 05:14 AM 9/20/11

    Some years ago, I found a link to a site showing the 6 basical emotion meaning face expressions, common for all mankind. The page was accessible only from the USA. Anybody having a tip on the reason why for this restriction, or willing to give free worldwide access to this useful information ?. Salut +

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

Follow Us:

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American MIND

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

The Eyes Have It: Scientific American Mind

X
Scientific American Mind

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X