Cover Image: May 2006 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

The First Few Microseconds [Preview]

In recent experiments, physicists have replicated conditions of the infant universe--with startling results















Share on Tumblr

THOUSANDS OF PARTICLES

THOUSANDS OF PARTICLES streaming out from an ultrahigh-energy collision between two gold nuclei are imaged by the STAR detector at RHIC. Conditions during the collision emulate those present a few microseconds into the big bang. Image: BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY/RHIC COLLABORATION

More In This Article

For the past five years, hundreds of scientists have been using a powerful new atom smasher at Brookhaven National Laboratory on Long Island to mimic conditions that existed at the birth of the universe. Called the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC, pronounced "rick"), it clashes two opposing beams of gold nuclei traveling at nearly the speed of light. The resulting collisions between pairs of these atomic nuclei generate exceedingly hot, dense bursts of matter and energy to simulate what happened during the first few microseconds of the big bang. These brief "mini bangs" give physicists a ringside seat on some of the earliest moments of creation.

During those early moments, matter was an ultrahot, superdense brew of particles called quarks and gluons rushing hither and thither and crashing willy-nilly into one another. A sprinkling of electrons, photons and other light elementary particles seasoned the soup. This mixture had a temperature in the trillions of degrees, more than 100,000 times hotter than the sun's core.


This article was originally published with the title The First Few Microseconds.



Subscribe     Buy This Issue

Already a Digital subscriber? Sign-in Now
If your institution has site license access, enter here.

3 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. Jim OHara 12:40 AM 12/4/07

    Thankyou

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. deanlsinclair 11:21 AM 7/20/08

    Several things disturb me about this entire approach. One is the assumption of reality of Qwarks and Gluons which are totally hypothetical particles. Another is that the "Strong and Weak Nuclear Forces" also are assumed to have reality, when, in fact, both are very possibly the result of the rather naive assumption that neutrons exist, as such in nuclei.
    It may be presumptious to do so, but, I would like to ask the people doing this kind of work if their results might not fit with some of my ideas expressed in the "Oscillator/Substance Model, information about which can be found in several places on the internet including my "pseudo-blog" at www.deanlsinclair.blogspot.com. Dean L. Sinclair(BA, MS, Ph.D) deanlsinclair@gmail.com

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. alexander khosrovyan 02:20 AM 1/31/10

    I believe very strongly in the theory of the expanding universe but like wise the contracting universe too. This I base on a very simple thruth that what goes up must come down dus what expands must contract too. Having said this I belive that there has been a series of BIGBANGS, or better said a continuation of BIGBANGS. From fienite to 14 billion years of expanding universe and likewisw short/long contraction. Thus back to fienite state.

    alexander khosrovyan

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

Tweets could not be retrieved at this time

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

The First Few Microseconds: Scientific American Magazine

X
Scientific American MIND iPad

Tap into your MIND

Get Both Print & Tablet Editions for one low price!

Subscribe Now >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X