Cover Image: December 2006 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

The Red Planet's Watery Past [Preview]

New observations by rovers and orbiters indicate that liquid water not only existed on Mars, it once covered large parts of the planet's surface, perhaps for more than a billion years















Share on Tumblr

WATER FLOWS

WATER FLOWS across the Martian surface in an artist's rendering of how the Red Planet may have looked 2.5 billion to four billion years ago. Salt deposits along the water's edge appear purple in this twilight view. Image: Ron Miller

More In This Article

[12/13/06 Author's Update: Last week's announcement and publication of results on the discovery of evidence for current liquid water on Mars in the very shallow subsurface is extremely exciting news for planetary scientists and astrobiologists. As I discuss in the following article, abundant evidence from the recent rover and orbiter missions indicates that there was liquid water on Mars early in the planet's history. The water may have been persistent and long-lived on and near the surface. However, one of the key issues that I indicated still need to be resolved is the duration of that watery period. How long was liquid water stable on the surface or the subsurface? If it was a long time, then Mars could have been not only a place that was habitable for life, but a place where life could have thrived and even evolved as environmental conditions changed.

Michael Malin and his colleagues discovered gullies that appear to have had liquid water flowing in them sometime in the last decade. It provides further support for water having been stable at or near the Martian surface for very long periods of time--indeed, perhaps even for the entire history of the planet. One implication of this discovery is that if life got a foothold on an Earth-like early Mars, then subsurface regions where water remains stable could be "oases" where that life could still exist today.


Subscribe     Buy This Issue

Already a Digital subscriber? Sign-in Now
If your institution has site license access, enter here.

1 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. pgtruspace 01:49 AM 6/16/09

    Why should mars have a useful amount of carbon or CO2. Actually I see no reason for much CO2 in a mars atmosphere after a very short time,geologicaly speaking. After all only a few thousand years ago earths CO2 levels were barely above the level needed to sustain plant life.A 100 million years ago earths CO2 levels were 10 times higher then now. As mars lost it's water (a real greenhouse gas) it cooled and CO2 circulation slowed allowing SO2 to predominate as surface water disappeared.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

The Red Planet's Watery Past: Scientific American Magazine

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X