Cover Image: March 2003 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

The Relentless Storm [Preview]

Bell Labs weathers the worst crisis of its 78-year history















Share on Tumblr

MICROMIRROR  light switch

MICROMIRROR LIGHT SWITCH created at Bell Labs was taken off the market during the telecommunications meltdown Image: LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES/ BELL LABORATORIES

For years, David Bishop has served as a standard-bearer for the postdivestiture Bell Labs. Trained as a condensed-matter physicist, Bishop demonstrated how someone who spent the formative years of his career doing high-temperature superconductivity experiments at one of the nation's top industrial laboratories could make the transition to overseeing early-stage product development. In the mid-1990s, as the emphasis on market-oriented research was growing, Bishop managed a group that fabricated microelectromechanical systems (MEMS), which contain tiny mirrors that can change the direction of optical signals. The initial research on MEMS resulted in his heading a team of about 100 people that built the LambdaRouter: a switch that could take a wavelength from one optical fiber and route it to hundreds of other pathways in a network.

The product was a showpiece of innovation at the laboratories. But in the summer of 2002, as the depression in the telecommunications sector reduced demand dramatically for new long-haul optical pipes, the LambdaRouter was pulled off the market. Not much interest lingered in a switch equipped to handle 10 terabits (trillions of bits) of switching capacity. Speaking of this experience, Bishop invokes the perfect storm, which, along with the nuclear winter, is constantly repeated as a metaphor for the telecommunications industry's financial implosion of the past two years or so. "Never before in the history of the company has its survival been so actively discussed," Bishop laments.


This article was originally published with the title The Relentless Storm.



Subscribe     Buy This Issue

Already a Digital subscriber? Sign-in Now
If your institution has site license access, enter here.

1 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. steevo_usa 03:24 PM 10/19/08

    Without a replacement of the Space Shuttle in sight and the inability to move people and materials into space, does this mean the end of NASA as we have come to know it?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

The Relentless Storm: Scientific American Magazine

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X