Sciam - cover

From the March 2008 Scientific American Magazine | 11 comments

The Switch Is On: Compact Fluorescents

By Mark Fischetti   

 
e-mail print comment

More from the Magazine

Incandescent lightbulbs may be history. As of 2007, compact fluorescent lightbulbs (CFLs), which are more energy-­efficient, had made only modest inroads because they were more expensive. But in December the U.S. Congress passed a major energy bill that included a new lighting standard. By 2012 manufacturers selling any 100-watt (W) bulb must make it 30 percent more efficient than today’s 100-W incandescent bulb. Similar requirements will phase in for 75-W bulbs in 2013 and 60-W and 40-W in 2014. Europe has passed its own rules, too. CFLs already meet the specs, and although makers will try to improve the old hardware, the new bulbs clearly have the edge and continue to improve.

The technology inside a lightbulb is quite advanced. The tungsten filament in an incandescent glows at more than 2,200 degrees Celsius and must be made perfectly uniform because any tiny imperfection will cause it to rapidly burn out. Yet only about 10 percent of the electricity entering the bulb is emitted as visible light; 90 percent or so is radiated as heat. A CFL is about four times as efficient as an incandescent bulb. A 26-W CFL can therefore shine as brightly as a 100-W incan­descent, requiring only one quarter of the energy. The tubular fluorescent bulbs common in overhead lighting are slightly more efficient still but do not fit standard light sockets, as CFLs do.

CFLs still present some problems, which manufacturers are solving. For example, some consumers find the light too harsh. “The human eye wants to see all color wavelengths,” says James Dakin, senior consulting engineer at GE Lighting in Cleveland, but the phosphor coating inside the bulbs fails to emit certain wavelengths. Phosphor improvements are filling in those holes, Dakin explains.

Early bulbs took several minutes to reach full output and may have hummed or flickered, but the electronic ballasts that have replaced the original magnetic ballasts have ended those shortcomings and also allowed smaller tubular shapes. “We have a huge effort under way to create CFLs that are suitable for more applications,” says James Meyer, general manager of GE Lighting. Lowering cost further, he says, is now mostly a matter of even greater mass production.

Light-emitting diodes (LEDs) could also pose competition in years to come; the solid-state lights are about as efficient and last three times longer than CFLs. But the screw-in versions struggle to outshine even a 25-W incandescent and cost far more. For now, CFLs have the brightest future.

Graphic - Subscribe     Graphic - Buy this Issue
Already a Digital subscriber? Sign-in Now
If your institution has site license access, enter here.


Read Comments (11) | Post a comment


Share
Propeller    Digg!  Reddit delicious  Fark 
Slashdot    RT @sciam The Switch Is On: Compact FluorescentsTwitter Review it on NewsTrust 
sharebar end

You Might Also Like


Discuss This Article


Click here to submit your comment.

VIEW:

2,573 characters remaining
 
  Email me when someone responds to this discussion.
 

risk free issuefree gift

Sciam - cover Email:
Name:
Address:
Address 2:
City:
State:  
spacer




Editor's Pick

  • Adapting to the Freshwater CrisisForward-thinking experts are getting a better handle on the growing global water shortage and coming up with innovative approaches to ensuring the security, safety and sustainability of this resource

Newsletter

Technology Newsletter

Get weekly coverage delivered to your inbox


 Podcasts

  • 60-Second Earth     RSS  · iTunes The Jellyfish Menace
    click to enable

    Download

  • 60-Second Science     RSS  · iTunes Plants Share Light If Neighbor Is Related
    click to enable

    Download





ADVERTISEMENT
 
 


Also on Scientific American


© 1996-2009 Scientific American Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
ADVERTISEMENT