Cover Image: October 2010 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

There's Wisdom in Those Tweets: Social Science Data Emerges from the Twitterverse

Researchers mine Twitter and find gold















Share on Tumblr

Critics have derided the 140-character messages posted daily on Twitter as trivialities. Yet to researchers, the popular social media site presents a rich trove of data. Barbara Poblete and her colleagues at Yahoo Research in Santiago analyzed tweets in the wake of February’s Chilean earthquake to learn how rumors propagate online. They found that people used Twitter to sort truth from falsehoods. Poblete’s group saw that 62 percent of tweets with earthquake-linked keywords from users in the Santiago time zone questioned or denied rumors that later turned out to be false. By comparison, when it came to confirmed truths, just 2 percent of tweets questioned them, and 0.3 percent were denials. Other researchers have used Twitter to track mood changes across the U.S. Alan Mislove, a computer scientist at Northeastern University, and Sune Lehmann, a Harvard University physicist, analyzed tweets that used words psychologists rated for emotional heft, such as “triumphant” and “suicide.” Their preliminary findings revealed that early mornings, late evenings and weekends rated the highest for happiness and that, unsurprisingly, the West Coast was happier than the East Coast.

The group now hopes to use Twitter to track changes in political climate. “Twitter is designed to be open, so we can look at content without violating anyone’s privacy,” Lehmann says. In April, Twitter announced it would donate its public tweet history to the Library of Congress. Researchers, at least, will be in a good mood about that.



This article was originally published with the title There's Wisdom in Those Tweets.



Subscribe     Buy This Issue

Already a Digital subscriber? Sign-in Now
If your institution has site license access, enter here.

2 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. twbeosl 09:48 AM 10/7/10

    The research seems to suggest there is wisdom ACROSS the tweets rather than IN them per se.

    This would seem to correlate with the "wisdom of the crowds/swarm" phenomenon that has been documented and more or less proven mathematically for dealing with simple problems, such as the number of jellybeans in a jar or the height of a building.

    But with Twitter, and other social networks like it, the more important question for the average user may be whether said user actually sees this larger group wisdom, or whether, since one's followers and followees are self-selected, the result on the ground, as it were, is more of an echo-chamber effect of that person's own biases.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. bpoblete 02:04 PM 10/8/10

    The full research paper of the earthquake in Chile study "Twitter Under Crisis: Can we trust what we RT?" by Marcelo Mendoza, Barbara Poblete and Carlos Castillo can be found at http://research.yahoo.com/node/3255

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

There's Wisdom in Those Tweets: Social Science Data Emerges from the Twitterverse: Scientific American Magazine

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X