These Are the Worst Meals You Can Eat in America

A new study on the most "Xtreme Food" in the country found some meals with more calories than a person needs in an entire day


Fast Company













Share on Tumblr

These Are the Worst Meals You Can Eat in America

These Are the Worst Meals You Can Eat in America Image:

By Morgan Clendaniel

A new study on the most "Xtreme Food" in the country found some meals with more calories than a person needs in an entire day. Take a look at these gut-busters.

Every year, the Center for Science in the Public Interest puts out a list of some of the most calorie-packed and utterly non-nutritious foods offered at the nation's largest chains. This year's list is full of some of the "heartiest" meals you can think of, but also some items that might trick you into thinking you're eating something vaguely healthy when you are, in fact, getting a few days worth of calories and sodium and fat in one plate.

Let's review. The amount of calories you need varies, but it's about 2,000 a day for a normal, semi-active person (but be honest with yourself: are even you semi-active?). You can play around with the Mayo Clinic's calorie counter here to get a better sense. But whatever your specific number is, it's not going to support eating one 2,000-plus calorie item a day.

Would you eat an entire family size box of Stouffer's Macaroni & Cheese with half a stick of butter melted on top? So when you order the Bacon Cheddar Double at Johnny Rockets and get 1,770 calories just from the burger (add another 590 for the sweet potato fries), you're really not doing yourself any favors unless you plan on not eating much for the rest of the day. Same with the Deep Dish Macaroni & 3-Cheese at Uno Chicago Grill which, according to the CSPI "has four cups of pasta; Cheddar, Parmesan, and Romano cheeses; an Alfredo sauce made from heavy cream, cheese, rendered chicken fat, and butter; and a crushed Ritz Cracker topping." Would you eat an entire family size box of Stouffer's Macaroni & Cheese with half a stick of butter melted on top? No? Because that's the same amount of calories.

And that's not even to mention sodium, which you want to try to limit to less than 2,300 milligrams per day (and you'd be fine with about 500 mg). Or saturated fat, which you want to keep at about 20 grams per day. Keeping those numbers in mind, consider the Chocolate Zuccotto Cake at Maggiano's Little Italy, which has 60 grams of saturated fat and is the equivalent of eating an entire eight-serving Entenmann's Chocolate Fudge Cake. Or the Country Fried Steak & Eggs combo at IHOP, which jams in 3,720 mg of sodium into one serving.

The CSPI notes that the new health-care bill will soon require all these chains to put calorie information on their menus. But will that discourage people from clogging their arteries with these meals? Evidence in places where calorie counts exist seems to indicate it won't. But as companies with calorie-heavy items like Coke start timidly addressing the obesity crisis, it's just a matter of time before restaurants that are putting together these meals are going to have to start thinking about taking a little more responsibility for what they're helping us put in our bodies.


Fast Company Copyright 2013 by Fast Company. Reprinted with permission.


3 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. JDoors 11:20 AM 1/17/13

    What are you TALKING about?

    "... whatever your specific number is[daily calorie requirements], it's not going to support eating one 2,000-plus calorie item a day."

    Not going to support? You mean you'll instantly die? Would it "support" one day with FEWER calories than you require?

    Hysteria over a single high calorie meal is not science.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. jafrates 01:42 PM 1/17/13

    Hysteria based on a misreading isn't helping, either.

    "[O]ne 2,000-plus calorie item a day" refers to a habit of eating something of that size pretty much every day. Once in a while isn't going to hurt you. A lot of people get fast food every day for lunch, and it doesn't take much to start approaching that 2000-calorie mark.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. brublr 10:20 AM 1/19/13

    I've found red pepper flakes is a good appetite restraint.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

Tweets could not be retrieved at this time

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Email this Article

These Are the Worst Meals You Can Eat in America

X
Scientific American MIND iPad

Tap into your MIND

Get Both Print & Tablet Editions for one low price!

Subscribe Now >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X