Thousands Dead, Missing in China Earthquake

Temblor hits western part of the country, leaving death and devastation in its wake















Share on Tumblr

SHANGHAI, China—The death toll from a 7.9-magnitude earthquake that rocked western China yesterday rose to nearly 12,000 and scores more were feared dead as rescuers continued to sift through the rubble of flattened schools and homes in search of thousands still missing, according to Xinhua news agency reports from the local government.

Wang Zhengyao, disaster relief division director at the Ministry of Civil Affairs, said that 11,921 people had died so far in the country's worst earthquake in three decades.

The worst hit areas remain inaccessible to rescuers, due to the remoteness and difficulty of the mountainous terrain of western Sichuan province. The death toll may continue to rise as officials are counting bodies as they discover them--and have recorded deaths in nearby provinces such as Gansu, Shaanxi and Yunnan, according to the Ministry of Civil Affairs.

The quake, which lasted several minutes, has leveled buildings in cities and towns across the province as well as cracking office buildings in the capital city Chengdu where many spent last night out of doors in fear of aftershocks. More than 26,000 have been injured and at least 9,400 remain trapped in such leveled buildings. The hardest hit area is the city of Mianyang, where more than 7,000 have been confirmed killed out of a population of more than 5 million.

Rescuers and troops worked frantically to clear roads turned to rubble by the powerful quake or blocked by falling rocks and mud. Conditions have also been worsened by persistent rain, but soldiers on foot reached the epicenter of the quake earlier today.

More troops and rescuers continued to pour into the region as world leaders offered aid, including the European Commission. And Chinese citizens across the country queued to donate blood for the relief effort.

"It's a nightmare. It's a tragedy," said Zhao Mu, a student at Shanghai International Studies University, echoing the sentiments of the world.

The epicenter of the quake was in Wenchuan County in Sichuan Province near the famed Wolong Nature Reserve, home of the panda breeding program--but was felt as far away as Bangkok.

The earth shook at 2:28 p.m. local time Monday and caused major damage in the provincial capital of Chengdu as well as the city of Chongqing. Minutes later, Chengdu experienced its own smaller quake—magnitude 3.9—that triggered the evacuation of office buildings.

Aftershocks rattled the western province throughout the afternoon, causing yet more damage, including the collapse of a middle school in the Sichuan city of Dujiangyan that trapped 900 children. Just east of the epicenter, 1,000 students and teachers were reportedly killed or missing at a collapsed high school in Beichuan county. China's premier Wen Jibao flew to the province to direct disaster relief efforts and troops were dispatched to the area to help.

According to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) official, Monday's tremor was relatively shallow—such quakes tend to do more damage near their epicenters than deeper ones. Another shallow quake, measuring magnitude 7.5, struck the northern Chinese city of Tangshan in 1976, killing more than 250,000 people. That temblor, which was slightly less intense than today's quake, is the second deadliest in recorded history.

Earthquakes are initiated by the release of energy stored in rocks clustered around a fault, which separates masses of Earth's crust known as tectonic plates. These rocks are held in place by friction. As time passes, the movement of the plates causes the rocks around the fault to bend and stretch. This causes the rocks to act like compressed springs, storing energy until the friction across the fault is no longer able to hold the rocks back, and a crack forms across the fault as it begins to slip. This releases part of the built-up energy, some of which creates the seismic waves that travel to the surface and cause damage.



1 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. toannang 03:46 AM 5/14/08

    An earthquake strike always come in surprise and it seems quite hard to avoid losses of lives!
    Most victims have been killed by falling objects on them! Therefore, more masses above their heads seem to become more chances to be killed by these massive objects!
    In China the land is so crowded and most people have to live in buildings and they will become victims for building collapses!
    In cities that have more residential buildings and office buildings will have massive losses of lives when earthquake hit!
    China is still lucky not to have an earthquake hit the Tree Gorges Dam and if it hit this location then losses today must be too high! However, the possibility the earthquake might hit the Tree Gorges Dam is definitely not 0% and no one wants to think about this occurence!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Thousands Dead, Missing in China Earthquake

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X