Time's Arrow FAQs















Share on Tumblr

More In This Article

  • Gravity's Engines

    We’ve long understood black holes to be the points at which the universe as we know it comes to an end. Often billions of times more massive than the Sun, they...

    Read More »

This article is a supplement to the feature "Cosmic Time Arrow: Does Time Run Backward in Other Universes?" from the June 2008 issue of Scientific American

If entropy always increases, then how do low-entropy objects such as eggs form in the first place?
The law of entropy applies to closed systems. It does not forbid decreases in entropy in open systems, including chickens. A hen takes in energy and goes through a great deal of effort to produce an egg.

Don’t some particle processes have a built-in arrow of time?
The decays of some elementary particles, such as neutral kaons, happen more frequently in one direction of time than the other. (Physicists do not need to travel backward in time to observe this asymmetry; they infer it from experiments on related particle properties.) But these processes are reversible, unlike the growth of entropy, so they do not explain the arrow of time. The Standard Model of particle physics does not seem to be of any help in explaining the low entropy of the early universe.

Doesn’t quantum mechanics have an arrow of time?
According to the standard interpretation of quantum mechanics, the measurement of a system causes its wave function to “collapse,” a process that is asymmetric in time. But the reason wave functions collapse yet never uncollapse is the same reason that eggs break yet never unbreak—namely, because collapse increases the entropy of the universe. Quantum mechanics does not help explain why the entropy was low in the first place.

Why do we remember the past but not the future?
To form a reliable memory requires that the past be orderly—that is, have a low entropy. If the entropy is high, almost all “memories” would be random fluctuations, completely unrelated to what actually happened in the past.

Is the multiverse theory testable?
The idea that the universe stretches far beyond what we can see is not really a theory—it is a prediction made by certain theories of quantum mechanics and of gravity. Admittedly, it is a prediction that is hard to test. But all theories of physics force us to go beyond what we can directly see. For instance, our current best model for the origin of cosmic structure, the inflationary universe scenario, requires us to understand the conditions even before inflation.



1 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. verdai 07:01 PM 1/12/10

    entropy actually has nothing to do with it.

    in the present, it is just passing views. In time itself there are other facts to consider above all.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Email this Article

Time's Arrow FAQs

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X