Tiny Distractions Can Double Mistakes

Just a three-second distraction, such as glancing at your phone, can divert your attention and double the number of mistakes you make


TechMediaNetwork













Share on Tumblr

Don't look down! Checking your phone may take just a few seconds, but that's enough to ruin your train of thought, according to new research showing that a three-second distraction can double the number of mistakes people make.

Given how commonly such distractions occur in modern life, the findings, published Jan. 7 in the Journal of Experimental Psychology, could have broad implications for how people work.

Multitasking myth

Past studies have shown that switching between many different tasks makes people worse at all of them. But those studies typically looked at longer distractions, said study co-author Erik Altmann, a psychologist at Michigan State University.

"We wanted to examine the kind of situation where someone is deep in thought and the phone rings," Altmann said. "After the phone call, you have to sit there and try to figure out where you left off in the task."

To test these situations, Altmann asked 300 undergraduates to complete a computerized task that involved a series of steps.

Students were shown a group of characters in different colors and formatting, and then asked to do several steps in order, such as picking out all the vowels, then all the red-colored letters, then all the even numbers, and so on.

Some of the time, the students could complete the task uninterrupted, but occasionally the computer screen would randomly display two letters and ask the students to type in those letters. Once the participants had done so, they went back to their tasks.

"It was meant to capture something like what you're doing when you're doing your taxes, because it's important to do the steps in the right sequence."

Though the distractions took only three seconds and weren't difficult tasks, students lost their places or made mistakes twice as often after those distractions as they did without interruptions.

Attention grabber

The distractions were so brief that they couldn't have caused people to actually forget the tasks they were doing, losing them from short-term memory. Rather, Altmann hypothesizes that the demands of switching attention, no matter how briefly, take mental energy that would otherwise have gone toward the task.

That has implications for productivity in the workplace, where short distractions such as email alerts and phone calls are ubiquitous, he said. These brief distractions may also affect how "present" people are in social situations, he said.

"When people are stealing glances at their cellphones, they're not quite with you in the same way as when they're looking you in the eye," he said.

Copyright 2013 LiveScience, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


TechMediaNetwork

3 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. Traveler 007 03:40 PM 1/22/13

    I'm sorry, I was distracted my this article.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. AllanRBrewer 04:26 PM 1/22/13

    Presumably females performed better after interruption than males since females are better at multi-tasking - which implies competence in fragmented task completion??

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. ultimobo 04:31 PM 1/22/13

    plus the time spent context switching - as an IT person, I first saw context switching as a factor in multi-threaded computing - it may waste, dunno, 20-50% of productive work time (of course if it's googling a quick answer to a current question, then it may not be a context switch) then I realised it also relates to people staring at screens - oh I didn't notice that other thing ...

    I believe Taiwan has made it a ticketable offence to cross a street staring at a mobile phone - too many hit by moving vehicles.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Tiny Distractions Can Double Mistakes

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X