Genetically Modified Tobacco Could Smoke Other Crops as Energy Source

Researchers have successfully tested genetic manipulations to increase oil accumulation in the leaves of tobacco plants














Share on Tumblr

tobacco-plant-genetically-modified-oil-extraction-biofuel

TWEAKED TOBACCO: Genetically modified tobacco could beat out soybeans as a biofuel source. Image: ISTOCKPHOTO/DANBRANDENBURG

Tobacco plants produce abundant biomass in more than 100 countries and could -- with certain genetic modifications -- be used to produce abundant biofuels, researchers say.

Researchers at the Biotechnology Foundation Laboratories of Thomas Jefferson University in Philadelphia, have successfully tested genetic manipulations to increase oil accumulation in the leaves of tobacco plants, according to a paper published online in Plant Biotechnology Journal.

"In the search for alternative biofuel plant resources, tobacco has been largely overlooked as it is considered primarily as an expensive crop grown for smoking," researchers Vyacheslav Andrianov and Nikolai Borisjuk wrote.

"When grown for energy production instead of smoking, tobacco can generate a large amount of inexpensive biomass more efficiently than almost any other agricultural crop," the researchers wrote.

In most plants, biofuel oil is extracted from the seeds rather than the leaves or stems. But while tobacco plants produce very oily seeds, they do not make large numbers of them, the researchers said.

To make tobacco plants more attractive as a feedstock, they tested two genetic modifications to shift oil production and accumulation into the tobacco plant's large and plentiful leaves.

By engineering plants to overexpress one gene, the researchers doubled the fatty acids extracted from a plant to 5.8 percent of the dry biomass weight for one tobacco strain and 6 percent for another.

A second genetic change made the plant accumulate up to 6.8 percent per dry weight of extracted fatty acids, they reported.

The researchers said further experimentation should be done to test whether making both of the changes in a single plant yields the full cumulative increase.

But if either of those gains could be secured at a large scale, tobacco could become a useful biofuel feedstock, they said.

Citing a 2008 study, the researchers said that if one assumed a conservative harvest of 170 metric tons per hectare for about 20 tons of dry biomass, engineered tobacco plants with 6 percent fatty acid by dry weight would produce at least twice as much biodiesel as a hectare of soybeans.

Extracting oil from the green parts of a plant is not as well understood as pressing it out of seeds, the authors noted, presenting a hurdle to commercial production. But the process could be expected to yield glycerin as a valuable byproduct, and the pressed leaves could be fermented to make ethanol, as well, they said.

"By generating both biofuel oil and ethanol, tobacco has the potential to produce more energy per hectare than any other non-food crop," they conclude.

Reprinted from Greenwire with permission from Environment & Energy Publishing, LLC. www.eenews.net, 202-628-6500


5 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. DavidHuieGreen 11:43 PM 1/6/10

    "Hey, Man, your car's smoking!"

    "Of course it is, Phillip Morris biodiesel."

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. dbmccauley 09:03 AM 1/9/10

    This approach (shift oil production and accumulation into the leaves) could be very beneficial if applied to grain crops (soybeans, corn, wheat, etc). The grain could be harvested as today and the stover and straw with high oil content could be used for fuel. Growing tobacco as fuel probably makes as much sense as growing corn for fuel - none.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. Renewable Ray 11:42 AM 1/10/10

    OK, I can get behind this to the extent that it is nota food crop [how stupid was that] but there is a water and fuel to produce issue. Of course I live in the desert. Of course I am going to think that.


    Ray @ Renewable Energy TV http://renewable-energy-tv.blogspot.com

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. Aldo 12:26 AM 2/1/10

    A question rather than a comment:

    What about using non-genetically-modified tobacco for biomass? Is it necessary to wait for so-called "benefits" of genetic modifications re: more oil etc before integrating tobacco into the biomass source "universe"? Waiting for expensive and time-consuming studies to be completed will keep this important crop from being utilized ASAP for biodiesel and foodstock production.

    Please advise.

    Thank you,

    Richard

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. Aldo 12:28 AM 2/1/10

    Question:

    Is it necessary to use genetically-modified tobacco for biomass production? Can curently available "conventional varieties" suffice?

    Please advise.

    Thank you,

    Aldo

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Genetically Modified Tobacco Could Smoke Other Crops as Energy Source

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X