Cover Image: October 2007 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

Tracking a Finer Madness [Preview]

Many believers in psychic phenomena are also inventive—a fact that may help bridge the gap between creative genius and clinical insanity














Share on Tumblr

The experimental setup is simple: a six-foot-wide, 60-foot-long corridor with a straight black line running along the floor. A blindfolded subject attempts to walk the line, and a researcher records any wobbles to the right or left. Christine Mohr, now a lecturer in experimental psychology and neuropsychology at the University of Bristol in England, designed the study for her doctoral dissertation at the University of Zurich. Before the study participants walked the line, Mohr asked them about parapsychology—specifically, their belief in so-called psi phenomena, including telepathy, clairvoyance and psychokinesis (using mental imagery to move objects).

How could there be any connection? In fact, the results were incontestable. Among some three dozen subjects, Mohr found that the more strongly an individual believed in extrasensory experiences, the more likely he or she was to stray to the left side of the line. This drift was slight—the subjects themselves were unaware of it—but Mohr’s calculations proved it. Further experiments at the University of Zurich revealed other trends among psychic devotees: on word association tests, they were apt to make more connections more quickly than skeptics were; they had far more notions about what a murky ink blot might resemble; and they were faster at identifying meaningful shapes among randomly generated patterns.


This article was originally published with the title Tracking a Finer Madness.



Buy This Issue
If your institution has site license access, enter here.

2 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. Advanced Media Group 01:17 PM 11/14/07

    Please visit www.advancedmediagroupresearch.wordpress.com

    I am telepathic.

    You may also visit www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com

    You may visit my blog at www.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com

    Thank You.

    Stan J. Caterbone
    Advanced Media Group

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. HealingMindN 10:09 PM 1/8/09

    With the towing to the left, enhanced ability to associate and recognise patters, this study seems to indicate more right brained activity. Does this mean that skeptics are more left brained or perhaps ignoring their right brain input due to their personal cognitive commitments?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

Follow Us:

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American MIND

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Email this Article

Tracking a Finer Madness: Scientific American Mind

X
Scientific American Mind

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X