Unhealthy Glow: Fluorescent Tadpoles Expose Chemical Contamination

Transgenic fish fry and larval frogs light up when exposed to hormone-disrupting compounds in water















Share on Tumblr

glowing-tadpole-on-penny

GLOWING TADPOLE: This tiny tadpole serves as a chemical sentinel, fluorescing when in contact with contaminants and more brightly with increasing exposure. Thanks to its small size, which can be used in an automated read-out system, the tadpoles can be used to test large number of water samples. Image: © Anthony Sébillot

In cartoons glowing goo signals that there is bad stuff in the water. Now life imitates art: A French biotechnology company has created a transgenic tadpole that fluoresces when it encounters chemical contaminants in water that disrupt thyroid functioning. The test promises to shine a light on a class of endocrine-disrupting pollutants, which pollution regulators have in their crosshairs.

This month France-based WatchFrog begins its first high-profile trial to test effluent from a hospital near Paris under the auspices of the ministries of environment and industry. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) is also evaluating the thyroid test, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is already using it.

Tests on living organisms—in vivo—are more revealing than traditional chemical analyses. Instead of targeting specific compounds, they can highlight any toxic chemical or mixture that disrupts a key organ or life system. Until recently, however, in vivo testing for endocrine disruptors has been conducted on full-grown animals, which means the process is slow, taking years to develop and weeks to execute. It is also expensive—each run costs 60,000 to 100,000 euros.

These impediments have let WatchFrog hop ahead. The company’s innovation is to combine the best of two worlds: “in vivo testing at the scale of in vitro,” says CEO Gregory Lemkine. WatchFrog’s three-millimeter-long Xenopus tadpoles, a common species in physiology labs, are small enough to fit in standard lab equipment. “Our tests cost between 10 and 20 times less,” Lemkine says, and they offer results in 24 to 48 hours.

Regulators are concerned because growing evidence shows that some synthetic chemicals—including those found in in insecticides, herbicides, fumigants, fungicides, detergents, resins and plasticizers—may disrupt the body’s endocrine system, which controls many important functions by emitting hormones, or natural chemical messengers. Chemicals can scramble the signal by mimicking hormones, blocking their receptors or altering hormonal levels.

Thyroid hormones, for example, affect brain development, metabolism and aging. They are also critical in amphibian metamorphosis.* Without thyroid hormones, a tadpole will not turn into a frog.

WatchFrog co-founder Barbara Demeneix turned this science into a toxicology test.* She combined a marker—a gene for a jellyfish protein that fluoresces green—with a DNA sequence that turns on the green fluorescent protein in the presence of thyroid hormones. The system shows where and when thyroid hormones (or contaminants mimicking them) induce metamorphosis. It also reveals the absence of those processes when hormone function is disrupted.

WatchFrog’s competitors are pushing ahead with analogous tests using fluorescing fish to detect estrogen disruptors.* Estrogen influences development of female reproductive behaviors, including egg production.*

Many fish can naturally change sex during their lifetimes, an adaptation to maximize sexual reproduction. Individual fish have a genetic predisposition to be male or female, but that can be overridden by hormone signaling. Unlike other fish models, medaka show genetic determination of sex clearly; males have a Y chromosome. Researchers can thereby measure estrogenic or androgenic effect against a fish’s genetic predisposition.

When transgenic fish encounter a chemical that prevents them from producing eggs or from changing sex, they light up.

Hong Kong-based Vitargent has commercialized a test using embryos of Oryzias melastigma, an Asian fish better known as medaka. Co-founder and chief technology officer Xueping Chen says the product is now in widespread use. “Our tests have been used extensively to … measure the estrogenic activity of a wide range of consumer products, including cosmetics and skin care products, drugs and health supplementary products, milk powders, meats, seafood and so on,” she says. Vitargent has also developed a dioxin test on zebrafish (Danio rerio).

It’s a market that WatchFrog is targeting, too. The company collaborated with Taisen Iguchi, a professor of environmental endocrinology at the National Institute for Basic Biology in Okazaki, Japan, and Masato Kinoshita, assistant professor of applied biosciences at Kyoto University, who had created a adult medaka laboratory test. WatchFrog adapted the model to a sturdier variety of medaka that would better hold up to commercial testing and uses fish fry to speed the process. WatchFrog also has a test for androgen disruptors, which affect male sexual differentiation.



Rights & Permissions

1 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. kienhua68 10:12 PM 2/7/13

    Another step forward as the real meaning of 'Silent Spring'reveals itself evermore clearly.
    How many generations till we rectify the damage already done by chemical concoctions we all assumed were safe?
    How long before we truly understand the effects of nuclear
    radiation damage starting with the first bomb to the latest Japan event?
    The effects of leaded fuel on mental development is one
    example. The purposeful withholding of information about the dangers of products containing lead, asbestos, mercury, agent orange and propellents used in cleaning products.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

Tweets could not be retrieved at this time

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Unhealthy Glow: Fluorescent Tadpoles Expose Chemical Contamination

X
Scientific American MIND iPad

Tap into your MIND

Get Both Print & Tablet Editions for one low price!

Subscribe Now >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X