Tumors grow their own blood vessels
Image:
By Alla Katsnelson
Tumors don't just rely on their host's blood vessels for nourishment--they can make their own vasculature, according to two independent studies from the United States and Italy. The findings offer an explanation for why a class of drug once heralded as a game-changer in cancer treatment is proving less effective than had been hoped.
Almost four decades ago, Judah Folkman, a cell biologist at Harvard Medical School in Boston, Mass., proposed that tumors were dependent on the blood vessels surrounding them, and that choking off that blood supply would kill the cancer. Bevacizumab (Avastin), the first drug to block blood-vessel growth, was approved in 2004, but it and other "angiogenesis inhibitors" have proved disappointing in the clinic, extending patients' lives for at best a few months.
Now two studies published online November 21 in Nature have identified blood vessels grown directly from cancer cells. So Avastin and drugs like it may be targeting a pathway that is not present in those tumor-made vessels, says David Cheresh, a cancer biologist at the University of California, San Diego, who was not involved in either study.
When it comes to treatment, "most people agree that a single pathway is not going to do it," he says.
Telltale markers
In both studies, researchers worked with tumor samples from patients with an aggressive type of brain cancer called glioblastoma. They found that many of the blood-vessel cells within the tumors contained genetic markers characteristic of the cancer cells, suggesting that the blood vessels were of tumor origin.
The researchers then used markers to identify a subset of tumor cells known to have stem-cell-like properties--that is, the ability to develop into cells with different functions. In a dish, these cells could make blood vessels and, when they were injected into the brains of mice, tumors developed with blood vessels that clearly came from the original human cells. Those stem-like cells, the researchers concluded, could form both tumor and blood vessel.
Such cells seemed to be first making blood-vessel precursor cells, and then differentiating into blood-vessel cells. One of the groups, led by Viviane Tabar, a neurosurgeon and stem-cell researcher at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York City, applied Avastin to cells in a dish to try to block these events. Although the drug did affect differentiation into blood-vessel cells, "we found that Avastin does not alter that first process whatsoever," says Tabar.
In the second study, Ruggero De Maria from the Italian National Institute of Health in Rome and his colleagues selectively killed the tumor-related blood-vessel cells. This caused the tumors to shrink, showing their reliance on those blood vessels. However, the number of tumor-derived blood-vessel cells in each tumor sample varied from 20 percent to 90 percent, suggesting that blood-vessel formation was more important for some tumor cells than others.
Tabar says that it is not clear whether this self-vascularizing capacity is widely present in other tumor types, although there are some hints that this is the case. "It would be very exciting if other tumor cells exhibit the same phenomenon," she says.
Two-pronged attack
This isn't the first time researchers have suggested that cancer cells can make their own blood vessels. In 1999, Mary Hendrix, a cancer researcher now at Northwestern University in Chicago, Ill., and her colleagues reported a similar effect in melanoma cells which they called "vascular mimicry."
At the time, says Hendrix, her group predicted that these vascular cells would prevent drugs such as Avastin from being fully effective, but their findings were controversial. The two latest studies support the idea's validity, she says, as well as demonstrating "an example of the functional plasticity of tumor cells".
Such plasticity means that researchers must look for a combination therapy that can target both the host vasculature, as Avastin does, and the stem-like cancer cells that can create both vasculature and tumor tissue, Hendrix adds.
Cheresh agrees. Today's findings in glioblastoma are not the only recent strike against anti-angiogenesis drugs. In the last two years, a handful of studies have reported that, counterintuitively, such drugs can speed tumor growth. But that doesn't mean that the strategy of targeting the blood supply is inherently faulty, says Cheresh, who co-authored two such studies.
"There are many more ways to affect the vasculature" than through such drugs, he notes: "It means we need to identify either more than one drug" to shut down blood vessels of tumor and non-tumor origin, "or a common molecular mechanism affecting both the tumor and the vasculature."
See what we're tweeting about
6 Comments
Add CommentThis is new? I thought it was known that tumors had their own vasculature. This is why they bleed...
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisPerhaps it was believed that the tumors were growing around the existing blood vessels?
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisThis is not only old news, its incomplete.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisCancer cells secrete a particularly powerful protein to encourage the growth of blood vessels. They can even grow blood vessels in the cornea of the eye, where otherwise none will grow.
What's new about this is that the tumors have their own angiogenic mechanism - they're not just recruiting new vasculature from the surrounding healthy tissue. Drugs that block "normal" angiogenesis may be ineffective because, apparently, the tumor cells use an altered method of angiogenesis.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisThis is a completely different and more insidious problem than tumors' accepted practice of secreting angiogenic factors to hijack the body's own [extensively-studied and somewhat-well-understood] mechanisms.
Sorry to double post.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisIt would be interesting to see just how good the tumor-derived vessels are. When researchers screw around with garden-variety angiogenesis, they often get the right types of cells growing, but not into structures recognizable as vessels. It'd be surprising if tumor cells did this differently enough to make the drugs ineffective, but still produced useful vasculature.
I thought I read about nanoballs, with tumor killing medicine in them, that took advantage of the looser wall structure of the tumor vessels to deliver their payload, by exploiting the larger pore size in the tumor vessels.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisThe nanoballs wouldn't leak through normal blood vessel walls, but would leak through the walls of sloppily built tumor vessels.
Is the sloppiness characteristic of self-constructed tumor vessels? Could you therefore combine Avastin and nanoballs to hit both types of vessel walls, regardless of the mix?