There is no market yet for turbines that turn the tides into a source of energy from deep beneath the sea. But that has not stopped mechanical engineers at the University of Strathclyde's Energy Systems Research Unit (ESRU) in Scotland from developing one that will ride the tide while latched to the seabed by a cable—like a kite flying on a windy day.

The ESRU team's goal: create a device that literally goes with the flow rather than resting on the sea bottom like an underwater windmill—a model already being developed by a handful of companies. The kite and cable model is designed to facilitate placing tidal turbines in deep water, where the stronger current has the potential for providing greater power but also makes it extremely difficult to plant a turbine in the seabed.

"The problem with regular turbines is the bigger they get, the harder they work, and the more likely the force of the water is to damage the turbine," says Andrew Grant, an ESRU mechanical engineer. "Our turbine can fly like a kite in the water." Instead of planting the base of a turbine in the seabed, researchers need only plant an anchor for the tether.

Another key difference in ESRU's design is that the turbine has two rotors attached—one in front of the other that turn in opposite directions on a single axis. The rotors' blades are made of either solid aluminum alloy or glass-reinforced plastic, depending on their sizes. By having the rotors turn in opposite directions, Grant and his team are trying to cut down on reactive torque (which pushes the turbine in the opposite direction) so that the unit can be attached to a relatively simple mooring system even in very deep water. This "contra-rotating" design has been tested on wind farms since the 1980s but did not provide an advantage (in terms of generating more energy with less wind) in the open air, Grant says.

New York City-based Verdant Power, Inc., has experienced firsthand the trials and tribulations of developing working tidal turbines. In fact, Verdant has taken the technology further than anyone else, having operated in New York's East River since 2006. That project began with six windmill-like turbines anchored to the river bottom, 30 feet (nine meters) below the surface, churning at a peak rate of 32 revolutions per minute. After the powerful current of the East River—which is actually a tidal channel—damaged the rotors and broke off some of the original fiberglass and steel blades, the company earlier this month whittled its test bed down to two turbines with new aluminum–magnesium blades 16 feet (five meters) in diameter.

"We only need two to complete our operational tests," says Trey Taylor, Verdant's president and head of market development. The East River turbines are already providing power to a nearby grocery store and parking garage on Roosevelt Island, situated in the river between Manhattan and Queens. The U.S. Department of Energy recently awarded Verdant $1.2 million for the company to further develop its technology over the next two years. Another $3.3 million has come in from the Canadian government—Verdant is testing a new type of turbine in the Saint Lawrence River near Cornwall, Ontario, that sits on the riverbed rather than being moored to the bottom.

Taylor says he is familiar with the ESRU's work and that Verdant itself even tested a tethered, kitelike turbine back in 2002. "I know what they're doing, and they've got a long way to go," he says. "We found that the tidal forces moving against it caused it to move up and down too much." Taylor says that the twin-rotor design is intriguing but questions whether the blades rotating in different directions might mitigate the turbine's efficiency in capturing the full strength of the tide. "It takes a combination of science, engineering and physics to get it right," he says, adding that he likes it whenever anyone experiments with tidal turbines because everyone working on the technology benefits from the results.

5 Comments

1. 1. inboulder 01:59 AM 9/26/08

   "It takes a combination of science, engineering and physics to get it right," says Tailor, who has difficulty understanding the most basic terms underpinning all technological endeavors.

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

2. 2. David M. Clemen 02:04 PM 9/26/08

   Larry Greenemeier (the author) should read this article. The tide is definitely "not" turning. This is just a start. It will be many years before they have functional turbines that are of any significant size, which are reliable, as stated in the article. Then you have to factor in the other costs for undersea turbines such as maintenance. I applaud their effort, but it will be a long time (20 years plus) before any substantial power generation can be attributed to this type of turbine; and I think the author of this article should apologize for using a journalistic "catchy" title to attract readers.

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

3. 3. diz21403 in reply to David M. Clemen 10:23 PM 9/26/08

   The author of this article should be reprimanded ffor being so uninformed on the subject. The Underwater Electric Kite is an American company and the Scot's design is a rip off of American technology. ( See uekus.com ) Why give them space?

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

4. 4. Norberto Duarte 10:59 AM 4/16/09

   The EU is preparing regulations concerning the Port Shore Power and RES as tide underwater turbines are interesting alternatives, since solved the maintenance, efficience and other technical issues, considering the location of many ports in stuaries.
   I have very good opinion of the Glasgow Strathclyde Universities in the field of marine and oceanic engineering, expecting good results for new underwater turbine in the short term.
   

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

5. 5. Finbarr in reply to diz21403 09:42 AM 4/20/09

   The Strathclyde tidal device is not a rip off of the UEK. The UEK is not a counter rotating turbine and hence a completely different design. The fact that it operates mid water column depending on water velocity is not a US concept either - see the the tidEl device (developed in the UK). There is no 'ripping of'f' occurring.

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this