Ubiquitous Chemical Associated with Abnormal Human Reproductive Development















Share on Tumblr

mother and son

Image:

  • What a Plant Knows

    How does a Venus flytrap know when to snap shut? Can it actually feel an insect’s tiny, spindly legs? And how do cherry blossoms know when to bloom? Can they...

    Read More »

Researchers have identified a link between exposure in the womb to widely used chemicals known as phthalates and adverse effects on genital development in male babies, according to a new report. Previous toxilogical studies had suggested that fetal exposure to the chemicals can affect reproductive development in rodents, but the new results indicate that developing humans could be vulnerable as well.

Phthalates are common components of items ranging from plastics to paints to personal care products such as nail polish and shampoo. In the first study of prenatal exposure to phthalates in humans, Shanna H. Swan of the University of Rochester and her colleagues studied 85 mother-son pairs. Prior to giving birth, the mothers supplied urine samples, which were analyzed for the presence and quantity of nine phthalate metabolites. The doctors also examined the children, who were between the ages of two and 30 months, for genital characteristics used as markers of normal sexual development.

When the researchers correlated the results with the mothers' level of exposure, they found that higher levels of four metabolites in their urine were correlated with a higher-than-expected number of changes to genital development in the baby boys. These changes include smaller scrotum and penis size and a smaller measurement known as the anogenital distance (AGD). None of the children were grossly abnormal, however, and the scientists detected no complete malformations or definite markers of disease. The results are consistent with the findings of animal studies, the authors note, but they caution that the use of AGD as a marker of sexual development in people is relatively new. Nevertheless, they conclude that the findings "support the hypothesis that prenatal phthalate exposure at environmental levels can adversely affect male reproductive development in humans." A report detailing the study will be published in an upcoming issue of the journal Environmental Health Perspectives.



2 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. msrirambiotech@gmail.com 07:31 AM 9/2/10

    Its really shocking to hear such a finding ! But when the scientists are proposing such environmental hazards that could affect the human off springs, they can also provide some advice on how to save ourselves from the exposure of such phthalates.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. mounthell 07:23 PM 3/2/12

    There are many sources of info, e.g.,:
    http://www.thedailygreen.com/healthy-eating/eat-safe/canned-foods-with-most-bpa-phthalates

    <b>"To Cut Your Exposure to Synthetic Hormones, Stop Eating Canned Foods</b> (3.30.2011 8:10 am)
    "In a new study, contamination from food packaging was identified as the main source of exposure to two suspect chemicals — bisphenol-A and phthalates. Cutting canned foods from their diets cut exposures by more than <b>50%</b>. Here are the top 10 canned foods to avoid."


    Read more: http://www.thedailygreen.com/healthy-eating/eat-safe/canned-foods-with-most-bpa-phthalates#ixzz1o0ZryWtP

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

Tweets could not be retrieved at this time

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Ubiquitous Chemical Associated with Abnormal Human Reproductive Development

X
Scientific American MIND iPad

Tap into your MIND

Get Both Print & Tablet Editions for one low price!

Subscribe Now >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X