U.N. Struggles to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions

While striving to secure an agreement to reduce greenhouse gas emissions globally, the international organization has seen pollution from its own activities, particularly flying, rise


Climatewire













Share on Tumblr

United Nations Building

EMISSIONS PROBLEM: Greenhouse gas pollution from U.N. activities, particularly flying, continues to grow. Image: flickr/Ashitakka

As it attempts to lead the world toward a more sustainable future, the United Nations has set a policy to move "towards a zero carbon future."

In a report released yesterday, the agency admitted that despite a campaign under way since October 2007, "much still remains to be done." Overall, according to the 30-page document issued by the U.N. Environment Programme (UNEP), its annual emissions are climbing.

The agency's latest data, from 2010, shows that it emitted 1.8 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent global warming gases. In 2009, the emissions were 1.7 million metric tons, indicating that its carbon footprint grew larger. The report adds, however, that its measuring system is still evolving, so totals for the two years are "comparable up to a point."

The United Nations, which is inviting world diplomats to a conference on sustainability in Rio de Janeiro in June, reports that its biggest problem is its ballooning air travel budget. It produced 51 percent of total 2010 emissions, up from 48 percent in 2008.

According to the report, the United Nations is trying to create a downward trend by encouraging train journeys over air travel, promoting e-conferencing and even providing bicycles for staff members to ride to work, along with free bike repair workshops and also bike-sharing programs.

Among the improvements cited in the report was a high-technology venture, a new UNEP office in Nairobi, Kenya. It features 6,000 square meters of solar panels. The new offices are "energy neutral," according to the report, meaning they generate as much power as they consume over a year.

There are low-tech projects, as well. Last October, the U.N. branch in Geneva encouraged hundreds of sheep to graze the grasslands surrounding its ornate offices in the Palais des Nations. "The sheep cut the grass in an ecologically sustainable manner," the report notes, "whilst providing natural fertilizer for the grass and flowers to grow in spring."

The United Nations, which has 54 agencies around the world and more than 200,000 employees, is on a learning curve. Achim Steiner, undersecretary-general and executive director of UNEP, put it this way in the report: "The process of moving the U.N. towards climate neutrality gives us direct experience of the complexities associated with preparing a large international organization for a green economy."

Reprinted from Climatewire with permission from Environment & Energy Publishing, LLC. www.eenews.net, 202-628-6500


Climatewire

5 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. JamesDavis 01:54 PM 4/25/12

    It is noble that the UN is taking the right step toward clean energy. The should had done this a long time ago.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. geojellyroll 03:38 PM 4/25/12

    Good. As long as UN bureaucrats appointed by tinpot dictators are preoccupied with irrelevent trivia, they aren't doing harm elsewhere.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. Dredd 03:40 PM 4/25/12

    "As it attempts to lead the world toward a more sustainable future, the United Nations has set a policy to move 'towards a zero carbon future.'"

    North to the future, then.

    The "methane volcanoes" erupting in the Arctic need to get some attention.

    http://blogdredd.blogspot.com/2012/04/new-climate-catastrophe-policy-triage-5.html

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. Carlyle 04:03 PM 4/25/12

    If you promote an unachievable target, logically it must fail.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. Chris G in reply to Carlyle 09:40 PM 4/25/12

    Yeah, because if you think you might crash anyway, there's no point in applying the brakes.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

U.N. Struggles to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X