Under stress, we fight or flee, or so scientists have long preached. But this response may really be just a guy thing. New evidence shows how, unlike men, women under stress “tend and befriend,” engaging in nurturing and social networking.

At the Cognitive Neuroscience Society 2010 annual meeting in Montreal, psychologist Mara Mather of the University of Southern California and her colleagues asked male and female volunteers to place their hand in ice water, which makes the stress hormone cortisol shoot up. Then they looked at angry or neutral faces while lying inside a brain scanner.

Men showed less activity in a key face-processing region of the brain than the unstressed men did, suggesting that their ability to evaluate facial expressions declined. In contrast, the region was more active in stressed women. Moreover, these women showed greater activity in the brain circuit that enables people to understand the emotions of others. The enhanced ability of stressed women to read faces and empathize could underlie the propensity to bond under trying circumstances, which may have evolved as a way to protect offspring.

This article was originally published with the title Under Threat, Women Bond and Men Withdraw.

2 Comments

1. 1. ozgnp 01:46 AM 6/21/10

   This study is obviously very incomplete. For example, why was no effort made to include showing faces with emotions other than anger or neutrality? I got the impression either Dr. Mather or Ms. Wickelgren was trying to use too narrow an experiment to prove a very sweeping conclusion. That is not good science at all.

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

2. 2. rpizanti 07:10 AM 9/17/10

   My experience and results of bonding while an RN working with women and a few men in emergency, critical care and flight nursing; similarly in military nursing; and bonding while working with men and a few women while working as a chaplain ministering to physically, psycho-socially and spiritually injured soldiers and their family's; and later serving with combat and support personnel in combat zones that were really threatened...were quite different than the Scientific American experiment conclusions...
   

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this