Cover Image: June 2008 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

Updates: Whatever Happened to Self-Cleaning Clothes?

Self-Cleaning Clothes -- Titan's Ocean? -- Synthetic Success -- Crisis Mapping















Share on Tumblr

Good-bye, Laundry
Talk of clothing that keeps itself clean, or that at least does not need conventional washing, has percolated for decades. Manufacturers have expressed interest in the technologies underlying such garments, but so far the only advance available commercially is clothing treated with nanoparticles that change the natural characteristics of the fabric to keep stains from soaking into it. That makes dirt easier to wash away. The technology, created by textile company Nano-Tex in 2001, appears in clothing today by retailers Eddie Bauer, Gap and Hugo Boss, to name a few.

Perhaps the most serious customer for self-cleaning clothing right now, though, is not the average mall shopper but U.S. military personnel, who might face long stretches between clothing changes. Chemist Jeff Owens is working with others at Tyndall Air Force Base in Florida on a process that fuses chemicals onto fabric, resulting in material that resists fire, oil and water and that also kills bacteria. Owens’s team is aiming to have the technology ready for preliminary demonstrations in 2009.

Despite today’s limited market, the quest for self-cleaning clothing with the potential for broader use continues. Researchers at Monash University in Australia have found a way to coat keratin protein fibers, such as wool, hemp and silk, with titanium dioxide nanocrystals that oxidize food and dirt in sunlight. According to lead researcher Walid Daoud, the process, outlined in the February 26 Chemistry of Materials, does not employ toxic reagents and is harmless to skin. The drawback: speed, or lack thereof. It takes 20 hours in the sun for a wine stain to disappear.

Karen Schultz


Waves below the Crust

Astronomers have wondered about the possibility of water—and, hence, of life—on Saturn’s moon Titan [see “The Mystery of Methane on Mars and Titan”; SciAm, May 2007]. Researchers modeling Titan conclude that a huge ocean may lie underneath the surface, which would explain observations by the Cassini probe that found peculiar shifts in Titan’s rotation and landmarks on the surface. The ocean may have resulted from heat from radioactivity at the moon’s core that melted a layer of frozen water. Luckily, the idea is testable: a subcrustal ocean would speed up Titan’s rotation rate in the coming year or two, followed by a slowdown—something that can be measured on succeeding Cassini flybys.

—J.R. Minkel


First Artificial Enzyme
With the goal of making synthetic biological components [see “Engineering Life: Building a Fab for Biology”; SciAm, June 2006], researchers have crafted the first artificial enzyme—specifically, an enzyme that removes a proton from a carbon atom. The team, from the University of Washington, the University of California, Los Angeles, and the Weizmann Institute of Science in Rehovot, Israel, used a computational model to devise potential enzymes constructed from 200 amino acids. After finding the enzyme that showed the most activity, the group further improved it by making it undergo evolution in a test tube. Seven rounds of evolution—the introduction of mutations—improved the enzyme’s efficiency 200-fold. Nature published the study online March 19.



5 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. Johnay 01:04 AM 5/24/08

    There is another drawback I have noticed in stain-resistant clothing: they are horrible for cleaning eyeglasses, with a tendency to just smear smudges instead of removing them.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. technovelist 03:15 PM 5/25/08

    I think it is quite unlikely that the "first artificial enzyme" is one that "removes a proton from a carbon atom", as stated on page 18 of the June 2008 issue. That would be transmutation, which I'm pretty sure cannot be done by chemical means (at present, anyway).

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. dashro 12:35 AM 6/1/08

    Actually removing a proton from a Carbon atom would be fission actually. I am sure this is an error.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. Donaldo 05:05 PM 6/6/08

    True about smearing your glasses. I don't want microparticles or anti-bactieral agents bonded into normal fibers. I want the living clothes that the '50s futurists said we were all supposed to be wearing by now. The ones that would clean themselves, repair themselves if they got ripped, grow with us so we only needed to ever buy one outfit when we were kids. Maybe even magnify our movements, and photosynthesize more energy then they needed so our own need for food would be less ... when's that coming!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. jgrotnes 10:58 PM 6/9/08

    They are not talking about removing a proton from the actual carbon atom nucleus, but pulling a H+ atom off the strong CH bond (Kemp elimination).

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Updates: Whatever Happened to Self-Cleaning Clothes?: Scientific American Magazine

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X