U.S. Makes First Plutonium in 25 Years, for Spacecraft

The Department of Energy doesn't disclose the size of the nation's Pu 238 stockpile, but some scientists think it's alarmingly low


TechMediaNetwork













Share on Tumblr

Curiosity rover self-protrait

The location of a rock target called "Knorr" is indicated on this self-portrait of the Curiosity rover in the "Yellowknife Bay" area. This self-portrait is a mosaic of images taken by Curiosity's Mars Hand Lens Imager camera during the 177th Martian day, or sol, of the rover's work on Mars (February 3, 2013). Image: NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS

The United States has begun producing plutonium-238 again for the first time in a quarter century, marking a key step toward averting a feared shortage of this important spacecraft fuel, NASA officials say.

The U.S. Department of Energy's plutonium reboot has not yet advanced beyond the test phase, but NASA is confident that production will eventually ramp up enough to power space probes for several decades to come.

"That's going to revive our supply and allow us to be able to complete a number of potential plutonium-necessary missions over this decade, and position us well into the decade after that," Jim Green, head of NASA's planetary science division, said Monday (March 18) at the 44th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference in The Woodlands, Texas.

Plutonium-238 is not a bombmaking material, unlike its isotopic cousin plutonium-239. But Pu-238 is radioactive, emitting heat that can be converted to electricity using a device called a radioisotope thermoelectric generator (RTG). [Nuclear Generators Power NASA Probes (Infographic)]

For decades, RTGs have been the power system of choice for NASA missions to destinations in deep space, where weak sunlight tends to make solar arrays impractical. For example, the agency's twin Voyager spacecraft, which are knocking on the door of interstellar space, both use RTGs, as does the car-size Mars rover, Curiosity.

The Department of Energy (DOE) stopped producing plutonium-238 in 1988, after which time NASA began sourcing the material from Russia. But the space agency received its last Russian shipments in 2010, and its supplies have been dwindling ever since.

The DOE doesn't disclose the size of the nation's Pu-238 stockpile, but some scientists think it's alarmingly low. NASA officials have said the United States has enough of the stuff to power space missions through 2020 or so.

The DOE's Pu-238 restart could change those projections. At the agency's Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee, engineers successfully produced small amounts of plutonium-238 by irradiating targets of neptunium-237 with neutrons, Green said.


TechMediaNetwork

4 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. reussere 01:44 AM 3/20/13

    Actually, the primary source of Plutonium 239 is produced in nuclear reactors with the following equation:

    U238 + N ->U239 emits 1 electron -> Np239 then another electron -> Pu239. The difficulty is that Pu240 is also produced and tends to contaminate the Plutonium. It takes almost pure Pu239 to make a bomb because Pu240 spontaneously fission's.

    Pure Pu238 is produced from Np237, usually in the form of Pu238 oside with the O16 isotope.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. greenhome123 10:55 PM 3/20/13

    I am curious if a Plutonium 238 Radioisotope thermoelectric generator could be used to power cars, boats, planes...etc, and if there is a way to encase them in some sort of nearly impenetrable container to prevent risk of radioactive contamination if such a vehicle were to crash.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. bush.chrisr in reply to greenhome123 05:17 PM 3/21/13

    Can't happen, the RTG's generally only produce a few hundred watts of power. They produce that power very evenly and reliably for decades. A car needs an electric motor that consumes somewhere in the 20,000 - 60,000 watt range depending on size and the performance you would like.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. bucketofsquid in reply to bush.chrisr 03:28 PM 3/29/13

    Thanks for the info. I once wondered the same in a high school physics class and the teacher thought it was an interesting idea. Nice to know that it really wasn't feasible. I guess the only way nuclear could power cars is via electrical generation for EVs.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Email this Article

U.S. Makes First Plutonium in 25 Years, for Spacecraft

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X