Daniel A. Lashof
NRDC Climate Center
The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) establishes the objective of preventing "dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system." While a "non-dangerous" concentration level has not been defined under the UNFCCC and is not a purely scientific concept, the European Union has set a goal of avoiding an increase of more than 2 degrees Celsius from pre-industrial levels in order to avoid the most dangerous changes to climate. This target finds strong support in papers presented at a conference hosted by Prime Minister Tony Blair at the Hadley Center, Exeter, in February 2005.1
Meinshausen shows that greenhouse gas concentrations need to be stabilized below 450 ppm CO2-equivalent in order to provide a high level of confidence that the 2 degree target will not be exceeded in this century.2 His multi-gas scenario (S450Ce) has global energy-related CO2 emissions of 480 GtC in the 21st Century. To obtain a U.S. CO2 emissions budget consistent with this stabilization scenario the U.S. share of global emissions is assumed to decline from 25% to 5% linearly between 2000 and 2100. This results in an emissions budget of 84 GtC in the 21st Century.
A simplified pathway for allocating this emission budget over time can be constructed as follows: U.S. annual emissions have increased by about 5% since 2001 to 1.6 GtC in 2005, implying that the U.S. will have consumed almost 10 GtC of this budget through 2006.3 The U.S. could stay within the remainder of its 21st Century emission budget by reducing emissions 60 percent linearly between 2006 and 2056 (consuming 56 GtC during that 50 year period) and then reducing emissions further from 0.64 GtC in 2056 to 0.2 GtC in 2100 (consuming the remaining 18 GtC).
This pathway contrasts with business as usual, in which emissions are expected to grow by 67 percent to 2.67 GtC in 2056. Required reductions from business as usual are therefore just over 2 GtC in 2056. Following Pacala and Socolow,4 a "U.S. Wedge" can be defined as an emission reduction of 0.25 GtC 50 years from now, reflecting the fact that U.S. emissions are almost 25 percent of global emissions today. Hence, eight U.S. Wedges are needed to stay on the stabilization pathway over the next 50 years.
Kuuskraa et al. developed a spreadsheet model to examine U.S. emissions scenarios to 2050.5 This tool facilitates accounting for the potential overlap between different measures (e.g., electricity end-use efficiency and renewable electricity supply) to develop self-consistent scenarios for the U.S. energy system. The Kuuskraa et al.'s spreadsheet model (extrapolated to 2056) is used here to construct an emissions scenario consistent with the U.S. carbon budget described above. In this scenario the largest reductions are obtained from energy efficiency improvements in electrical end uses, non-electric stationary end uses, and motor vehicles. Additional reductions come from renewable fuels and electricity and carbon capture and disposal at coal-fired power plants and other high-concentration industrial CO2 vents. The elements of this scenario are briefly outlined below.
1. Electric end-use efficiency, 2.2 Wedges (0.54 GtC): Efficiency improvements in motors, lighting, refrigeration and other electrical equipment reduce total electricity consumption by 40% in 2056 compared to BaU. Resulting total electricity consumption is 4400 billion kilowatt-hours (Bkwh), 20 percent greater than current consumption levels. California has demonstrated in practice that such reductions are possible. Sustained policies to promote energy efficiency through a combination of appliance standards, building code enforcement, and utility efficiency programs have stabilized per capita electricity consumption in California over the last 30 years while national per capita electricity use continued to grow such that per capital electricity consumption in California is now more than 40% lower than in the rest of the country.6