Virgin Births Seen in Wild Vipers

A recently examined snake brood represents the first example of wild facultative parthenogesis in a sexually reproducing species















Share on Tumblr

copperhead snake

Female copperhead snakes (Agkistrodon contortrix) can give birth without mating first. Image: C. Smith/P. Eskeridge/The Royal Society

  • What a Plant Knows

    How does a Venus flytrap know when to snap shut? Can it actually feel an insect’s tiny, spindly legs? And how do cherry blossoms know when to bloom? Can they...

    Read More »

By Brian Switek of Nature magazine

It usually takes two snakes — a female and a male — to make a litter of baby copperheads. But research now shows that copperheads (Agkistrodon contortrix) and their venomous cousins cottonmouths (Agkistrodon piscivorus) don’t always require a partner to establish the next generation. These vipers are capable of virgin births.

For some vertebrates, parthenogenesis — asexual reproduction in which embryos develop without fertilization — is the norm. The New Mexico whiptail lizard (Cnemidophorus neomexicanus), for example, is an all-female species that reproduces without any genetic contribution from a male.

But in zoos and aquariums, zoologists have begun to document the strange phenomenon of facultative parthenogenesis: females of species that usually reproduce sexually, delivering offspring without mating. Surprise pregnancies have been documented among birds, sharks, snakes and Komodo dragons (Varanus komodoensis), but until now, only in captivity.

Warren Booth, a molecular ecologist at the University of Tulsa in Oklahoma, now reports the first known case of wild facultative parthenogenesis, publishing the study today in Biology Letters.

In work conducted while he was at North Carolina State University in Raleigh, Booth and his colleagues captured pregnant wild copperheads and cottonmouths, which gave birth in the lab. The researchers suspected that some of the snakes had reproduced without male input: in comparison with those born from sexual unions, says Booth, asexually reproduced snake litters typically have a large number of failures in development such as stillborn babies, and few viable males. When he saw that some of the snakes had delivered broods with these characteristics, “these litters were at the top of my agenda to genotype”, says Booth.

Serpent sexuality
Booth examined genetic markers in the mothers and offspring to check whether the young snakes had really been born as a result of facultative parthenogenesis, or were unusual broods sired by males that were genetically similar to the mother.

“When I got the results of the DNA sequencer, I was floored,” he says. The genotyping compared the genetic make-up of the offspring with the populations from which the snakes were collected; the results indicated that the chance of a male contribution was “infinitesimally small”. Researchers had always believed that facultative parthenogenesis took place in the wild, Booth notes, but he and his colleagues were “stunned” at finally finding the evidence.

It is not clear how asexual reproduction evolved in normally sexual species, but the absence of a process called genomic imprinting may have had a role. In mammals, genomic imprinting causes a set of genes from one parent to dominate over the other, and this interaction requires genes from both parents to create viable offspring. Reptiles don't undergo genomic imprinting, so mating isn't required for mothers to develop their young — but it is not known why.

Nor is it known what spurred the female snakes to reproduce asexually. Booth points out that isolation from males is not the key: the snakes were collected from habitats with males, which undoubtedly were on the lookout for females. For whatever reason, the females forsook their potential mates, or rejected sperm from pairings, to deliver parthenogenic litters. Booth says that the finding removes the “prevailing dogma” that facultative parthenogenesis occurs only when females are isolated.

Phill Watts, an ecological geneticist at the University of Liverpool, UK, agrees that the study calculated “a convincingly low probability for male parentage”. The discovery may motivate other researchers to search for further examples. “We still lack data to understand when and why facultative parthenogenesis happens in the wild,” says Watts. There are almost certainly other asexually reproducing snakes, sharks and lizards out there, but the biological impetus for their wonderful births is, as yet, a mystery.

This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on September 12, 2012.



9 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. janejain 04:43 PM 9/12/12

    Wow so awesome. We know nothing ;)

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. Derick in TO 04:55 PM 9/12/12

    Deliciously ironic.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. asdfasdfasdfasdfas3 05:36 PM 9/12/12

    If we found remains of Jesus and Mary, could we verify whether or not that was a virgin birth?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. BuckSkinMan 11:47 PM 9/12/12

    Wondering if any kind of parthenogenesis contributes to the population explosion of boas and pythons in Florida. Whatever, the last thing we need is more of them - or of copperheads and water moccasins for that matter.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. Joel454 in reply to asdfasdfasdfasdfas3 12:35 AM 9/13/12

    Jesus would have had to be a girl. Marry would have had no X chromizone to give him.

    Besides there are other much simpler explanations

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. wesbrown70 in reply to asdfasdfasdfasdfas3 07:06 PM 9/13/12

    Of course! If Jesus were completely homozygous he would be a candidate for virgin birth. If not, then not.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. dragonasbreath 07:50 PM 9/13/12

    Ah, but are you so very sure of that?
    Whether the fetus turns out to be a boy or girl (regardless of chromosomal state) is determined by the testosterone level in Mother's womb during the critical time period.
    A woman under extreme stress during this window will birth a boy with XX, and one who cannot produce sufficient testosterone will birth a girl with XY.
    This has been established, so Mary could easily parthogenetically give birth to a boy.
    Whether he would be fertile is a question the search for a YY male did not ask. (Nor the OTHER obvious question - which they were probably terrified of)

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  8. 8. dragonasbreath 07:52 PM 9/13/12

    And yes, boys, you secrete a hormone that stresses mom during the critical time to ensure you come with the correct equipment.
    Just as both boys and girls secrete a hormone that tells mom it's time to start the delivery process whether HER body thinks so or not.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  9. 9. jackvandijk 05:45 PM 9/19/12

    long live maria

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Virgin Births Seen in Wild Vipers

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X