Visualizing The World's E-Waste Problem

Every day, we throw out an enormous amount of precious metals that are hiding inside our old electronics. Just how much?


Fast Company













Share on Tumblr

Visualizing The World's E-Waste Problem

Visualizing The World's E-Waste Problem Image:

By Ariel Schwartz

Every day, we throw out an enormous amount of precious metals that are hiding inside our old electronics. Just how much? This infographic will shock you, especially if you like gold.

Electronics supply chains have become a popular topic of discussion over the past few years, mainly because of Apple's labor and environmental issues in its factories. But the other end of the supply chain--what happens after electronics are tossed in the trash--isn't talked about nearly as much. We're as guilty of that as anyone. And yet, e-waste is a really, really big deal.

This infographic from breaks the problem down in stark terms: over 130 million cell phones are tossed in the trash every year in the U.S. (that figure is from 2010; the number may be higher now), and 17,000 tons of e-waste are thrown away or recycled every day. The vast majority of our e-waste is thrown in the garbage, even though it contains valuable materials that can be reused.

Believe it or not, the U.S. is actually better than most other countries at recycling e-waste. Only the U.S., U.K., and Spain reach a 15% recycling rate--other countries fall way behind, largely because of a lack of easy recycling options.

The number of electronics purchased worldwide is growing at a rapid clip, especially on the smartphone front. This infographic doesn't go into the growth of so-called feature phones, but those are quickly becoming more popular as well. In developed countries, companies like Apple (yes, it deserves to be called out, especially now that it's the biggest phone seller in the U.S.) that constantly refresh their products feed the gadget turnover cycle.

There are a lot of materials to be mined from our dead electronics, if only we'd recycle them. One million mobile phones can yield 9 kilograms of palladium, 24 kilograms of gold, 250 kilograms of silver, and 9,000 kilograms of copper. Recycling all those materials have an added benefit: It's much less energy-intensive to recycle metals than to mine new ones. Plus, recycling creates new jobs (in the recycling industry).

The infographic fails to mention the dismal conditions that sometimes plague e-waste recycling operations--that's important to keep in mind when discussing how we should increase recycling rates. But it's not something that should discourage recycling; recycling centers are just another piece of the electronics supply chain that need to be cleaned up.

Check out the full infographic below.




Fast Company Copyright 2013 by Fast Company. Reprinted with permission.


1 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. sethdayal 11:42 AM 2/14/13

    So 15% of deadly toxic forever solar panels will be recycled, the bulk occupying cubic miles of landfill space slowly leaching into our water supply.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Visualizing The World's E-Waste Problem

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X