Washington State Declares War on Ocean Acidification

The state, a leading U.S. producer of farmed shellfish, has launched a $3.3-million, science-based plan to address this growing problem for the region and the globe















Share on Tumblr

Dangerous Shellfish

As leading producer of farmed shellfish in the US, Washington's industries are being adversely affected by ocean acidification. Image: Flickr/kestrana

Washington state, the leading US producer of farmed shellfish, today launched a 42-step plan to reduce ocean acidification. The initiative — detailed in a report by a governor-appointed panel of scientists, policy-makers and shellfish industry representatives — marks the first US state-funded effort to tackle ocean acidification, a growing problem for both the region and the globe.

The state governor Christine Gregoire,  says she will allocate $3.3 million to back the panel's priority recommendations.

“Washington is clearly in the lead with respect to ocean acidification,” says Jane Lubchenco, administrator of the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).

As growing carbon dioxide gas emissions have dissolved into the world’s oceans, the average acidity of the waters has increased by 30% since 1750. Washington, which produces farmed oysters, clams and mussels, is particularly vulnerable to acidification, for two reasons: seasonal, wind-driven upwelling events bring low-pH waters from the deep ocean towards the shore, and land-based nutrient runoff from farming fuels algal growth, which also lowers pH.

As a result, the region is already experiencing levels of acidity three-fold greater than the global ocean average, with devastating impacts on the state’s US$270-million shellfish industry. Acidic waters are corrosive to many larval shellfish, and they reduce the amount of available carbonate, which some marine organisms need to form calcium carbonate shells or skeletons.

Sea-grass soak
The panel recommends creating of an "acidity" budget to account for natural and human-influenced sources of acidity; improved methods of forecasting corrosive conditions; and finding ways to use sea grasses to soak up carbon dioxide in shellfish hatcheries.

Improved monitoring will be crucial for better understanding acidification trends, its contributing factors and the biological responses of marine organisms. “We lack real-time, high resolution data — which is key because conditions are so variable,” says panel member George Waldbusser, a marine chemist at Oregon State University in Corvallis.

Sensors to measure pH and carbon dioxide abundance have so far been added to 17 existing observing systems nationally, says Dick Feely, a panel member and marine chemist with the NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory in Seattle, Washington. The NOAA plans to have 60 such monitoring sites nationally in the next few decades. “It’s an early warning system we’re trying to put together to help industry adapt to changing, sometimes severe, conditions,” says Feely.

The effort to find comprehensive, creative solutions regionally is impressive, says Scott Doney, a marine chemist at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in Massachusetts, who was not involved with the panel. “It’s interesting how they tailored applied science to help aquaculture with a broader research agenda to understand the factors affecting the shellfish industry,” he says.

Despite the report’s regional focus, the authors clarify that the most urgent need is to reduce global carbon dioxide emissions. “Reducing carbon emissions is crucial, but it’s not a problem that Washington alone can solve,” says panel co-chair Jay Manning, an environmental lawyer at Cascadia Law Group in Olympia, Washington, and former director of the Washington Department of Ecology.

Lubchenco emphasizes that the report highlights the need to formulate adaptation strategies to ocean acidification as well as the urgency to create a stronger momentum to reduce global carbon emissions. "We don't have the luxury of doing one or the other," she says. "We have to do both."

This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on November 27, 2012.



4 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. jec477 09:09 PM 11/27/12

    A recommended first step would be to stop conflating acidity with pH.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. RSchmidt in reply to jec477 10:17 PM 11/27/12

    Didn't see any conflating. Acids certainly lower pH but I didn't see anywhere where they said pH = acidity. That would be like saying KPH (MPH for troglodytes) = high speed.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. Shoshin 06:51 AM 12/1/12

    What are the relative contribution of factors such as industrial pollution and agricultural run off? If 95% of the problem is caused by agriculture and industry, singling out climate change is meaningless.

    Also, the quoted 30% drop in pH comes from a Wikipedia paper about undersea volcanic vents, so blaming climate change is unsupported. The authors get an "F" on their research.

    The basic premise of this article is flawed. No point discussing it further.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. mo98 09:54 AM 12/5/12

    Underwater volcanic vents have always existed. Evidence of damaged shells is due to 30% increase in relative ocean acidity. I suggest examining Pourbaix diagrams that may help identify the propportionality of future chemical stabilities in the oceans.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

  • huler Trying, failing to spend money on Delta Airlines. Unnavigable website. 2+ hours hold time. But -- they promise to call me when it's my turn.
    28 minutes ago · reply · retweet · favorite
  • tvjrennie @DrBondar @docfreeride If we can't all be in same city at once, would tele-partying suffice? Virtual debauchery?
    50 minutes ago · reply · retweet · favorite
  • docfreeride Better-half reconstructing "License to kill Mad Men", a cocktail that melds a Vesper Martini w/ rye. High proof = hard to recall accurately.
    1 hour ago · reply · retweet · favorite
More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Washington State Declares War on Ocean Acidification

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X