Cover Image: July 2011 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

What Is It?

Charlotte's ancestor















Share on Tumblr



Image: Paul A. Selden

More In This Article

Thanks to a chance find by farmers in Inner Mongolia, scientists have learned that today’s largest web-weaving spiders are about 130 million years older than previously thought. In 2005 Chinese farmers digging in ancient volcanic ash unearthed the fossil at the right, the biggest spider fossil ever discovered and one of the best preserved. Paul A. Selden, director of the University of Kansas Paleontological Institute, and his colleagues, writing in April in the online Biology Letters, report that the female spider, a member of the Nephila genus, measures nearly one inch in length, has a leg span of more than five inches and is 165 million years old. “Extremely fine details, such as sensory hairs called trichobothria, which the spider uses to detect air vibrations, can be seen,” Selden says. No word on her ability to write “Some pig.”



Subscribe     Buy This Issue

Already a Digital subscriber? Sign-in Now
If your institution has site license access, enter here.

7 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. quizzical 11:57 AM 6/24/11

    Very Interesting article.
    But where is even one single "predecessor" such as Darwin imagined?
    This spider looks exactly like a contemporary spider to me. But then, since I am no expert on arachnids, who would listen to me? I just wonder if the dating methods are as accurate as they are presumed to be.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. lamorpa in reply to quizzical 08:24 AM 7/8/11

    @quizzical: Yes. The dating methods are as accurate as they are presumed to be, by multiple independent verifications. Why do you ask? As far as the "predecessor" goes, there are millions of examples, sequences, adaptations, etc. How have you missed them?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. JamesDavis 08:50 AM 7/8/11

    Indeed, that is very interesting that that spider can be that old and still look like a modern day spider. I wonder what did that spider evolved from and how many years it took it evolving to get to looking like that? Paleontologists are always saying that we modern humans evolved from monkeys... I wonder if this spider has changed their minds on that theory and we can start calling a rose a rose again?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. nogod in reply to JamesDavis 09:42 AM 7/8/11

    Maybe you should go ask your church? Paleontologists never said that homospaians evolved from "monkeys". You should have paid more attention in biology class.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. David N'Gog 01:26 PM 7/8/11

    The fact that spider "design" hasn't changed much in 165 million years isn't that big of a surprise really.

    Just like roaches- also been around a long time without changing- they are perfect to fill the niche they're in- and fill in nicely in just about every eco-system in which animals can survive.

    Nonetheless to say spiders haven't evolved is rediculous. There isn't enough evidence to say that. Fossils don't show us the internal workings- and we don't have fossils going back that far for all the widely diverse types of spiders we have today.

    The basic shape may be the same- but that's only because it's a good fit for the spirder's "purpose".

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. JamesDavis in reply to nogod 04:34 PM 7/8/11

    "nogod", did you make it through the fifth grade? Maybe you should go back to school and learn the meaning of church-n-god and what people are called who study bones and other fossils. You are a pathetic person who throws god into everything you do not understand.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. co2dog 09:33 PM 7/11/11

    Environmental fit. That's the message of Darwin. Look at the coelacanth that is essentially unchanged from before the dinosaurs,and also ants, cockroaches, jellyfish, etc. These organisms have survived without detectable change because of environmental fit. Live well enough to have kids that look like you and the ones that don't look like you die out because the ones like you are better fit. No changes without a need to change.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Email this Article

What Is It?: Scientific American Magazine

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X