What New York City Would Look Like Buried In Its Own Carbon Emissions

Imagine if carbon wasn't a formless gas, but rather a solid ball. We'd be forced to deal with our emissions problem much faster, because look at what would happen to New York as the carbon piled up.


Fast Company













Share on Tumblr

What New York City Would Look Like Buried In Its Own Carbon Emissions

What New York City Would Look Like Buried In Its Own Carbon Emissions Image:

By Ariel Schwartz

Imagine if carbon wasn't a formless gas, but rather a solid ball. We'd be forced to deal with our emissions problem much faster, because look at what would happen to New York as the carbon piled up.

One of the many reasons why people fail to acknowledge the seriousness of greenhouse gas emissions is that they're invisible. You can't see carbon dioxide piling up on the street; you can only see the disasters that happen in the wake of climate change. A project from Carbon Visuals and the Environmental Defense Fund imbues emissions with a sense of physicality by showing what it would look like if New York City was literally covered in its CO2 emissions (depicted in the video below as blue bubbles).

Carbon Visuals came up with the visuals by looking at carbon emissions data from 2010, published by the Mayor's Office of Long-Term Planning and Sustainability. That data tells us that the city emitted 54,349,650 metric tons of carbon dioxide during the year--meaning 1.72 tons of CO2 per second were released. As Carbon Visuals explains, "At standard pressure and 59° F a metric ton of carbon dioxide gas would fill a sphere 33 feet across (density of CO₂ = 1.87 kg/m³)." So if CO2 actually emerged from polluting sources as giant blue bubbles, we'd see a new bubble pop up every 0.58 seconds.

Here, we can see a street-level view of emissions as they seemingly bounce on top of cabs.

These are the emissions from a single hour (6,204 spheres).

After a year, things really start to pile up. There are 54,349,650 spheres, resembling a mammoth pyramid that overshadows the NYC skyline.

Should this scare you? Sure, but New York already cut down its emissions in 2010 by 12% compared to 2006 emissions. The city is also working to slash emissions 30% by 2017. As Yale e360 points out, the city is a model of environmental responsibility compared to most other areas in the U.S. As of 2009, the metro NYC area emitted 7.1 metric tons of greenhouse gases per person annually, which is 30% less than the U.S. average. And according to the Mayor's Office of Long-Term Planning and Sustainability report, NYC is responsible for fewer emissions than even "green" cities like San Francisco.

Cities are responsible for 70% of all emissions worldwide, though, so there is still plenty of room for improvement--and not just in NYC. Even though it's not so tangible, all cities are currently engulfed in that giant pyramid. It might be time to dig ourselves out.




Fast Company Copyright 2012 by Fast Company. Reprinted with permission.


Comments

Add Comment
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

Tweets could not be retrieved at this time

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

What New York City Would Look Like Buried In Its Own Carbon Emissions

X
Scientific American MIND iPad

Tap into your MIND

Get Both Print & Tablet Editions for one low price!

Subscribe Now >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X