Cover Image: December 2008 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

When Imitation Is More Than Flattery

Imitating others' emotional expressions may foster empathy














Share on Tumblr

Most of us reflexively grin when we see another beaming face and grimace when we see a comrade in pain. New research suggests that such mimicry helps people—especially women—more quickly grasp others’ emotional expressions.

In their recent study Dutch psy­chologists Mariëlle Stel of Leiden University and Ad van Knippenberg of Radboud University Nijmegen showed 62 research participants a series of photographs of faces, each for less than a tenth of a second. After viewing each face, participants pressed a button to indicate whether the image displayed positive or negative emotion. For half the experimental trials, Stel and van Knippenberg instructed participants to avoid mimicking the faces’ emotional expressions and to clench their teeth, which hindered their ability to do so. In a control condition, participants were asked to hold their shoulders still as they responded, a constraint that the researchers believed was about as distracting as having to avoid moving facial muscles. The investigators measured how quickly participants responded to each face and found that when women were free to mimic emotional expressions, they were faster than men were to recognize whether the emotion was positive or negative. When mimicry was constrained, the men were not affected, but the women slowed down to the males’ speed.

The results square with brain-imaging studies that suggest that our brain possesses a shortcut for processing emotional expressions, the authors say. The findings also hint that women may make more use of this biological shortcut than men do. Social psychologist Dacher Keltner, who studies emotions at the University of California, Berkeley, says the study is important because it corroborates other work showing that, as compared with men, women report greater correspondence between their own emotions and those of others and that they experience higher levels of empathy. Most existing data, Keltner explains, depend on research participants’ self-reported perceptions: “This study shows that these gender differences are also observed in very fast, behavioral mimicry.”

What remains unknown is how com­monly people mimic emotional expres­sions in natural circumstances or whether mimicry is essential for the “fast route” that women take to emotion recognition, according to psychologist Simon Baron-Cohen of the University of Cambridge. “Certainly there is lots of evidence that females have a stronger drive to em­pathize, but whether this is mimicry-mediated remains to be firmly established. This new study is at least consistent with that possibility,” he says.

Note: This article was originally printed with the title, "More Than Flattery".


This article was originally published with the title More Than Flattery.



Buy This Issue
If your institution has site license access, enter here.

Comments

Add Comment
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

Follow Us:

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American MIND

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Email this Article

When Imitation Is More Than Flattery: Scientific American Mind

X
Scientific American Mind

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X