Cover Image: April 2010 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

Wonders of Life

Various items that have come across my desk and did not roll off















Share on Tumblr



Image: Matt Collins

  • What a Plant Knows

    How does a Venus flytrap know when to snap shut? Can it actually feel an insect’s tiny, spindly legs? And how do cherry blossoms know when to bloom? Can they...

    Read More »

Cheetos Lip Balm. That’s right, you can purchase lip balm imbued with the delicate flavor of Cheetos. Somehow I lived in blissful ignorance of that fact until quite recently, when I discovered that chemists had pulled off this minor miracle back in 2005. As I pondered the idea of a cheese-puffy lip protector, a flood of memories of never having read Proust rose up within me, and I thought of what marvelous recollections he might have come up with had he ever tasted a crunchy curl of faux cheese delicately lifted from a greasy plastic bag, the junkified morsel staining thumb and forefinger a sickly, artificial orange. But I couldn’t think about that for long because I was soon busy thinking about other stuff, stuff I’ll now ask you, dear reader, to think about, too.

Here’s something else I just learned about: in a 2007 poll respondents on average estimated NASA’s funding to be 24 percent of the federal budget. Fixing those busted space toilets is expensive, but not that expensive: NASA has in fact been getting about $18 billion annually in recent years, less than 1 percent of the budget. NASA would get about $1 billion more each year under the draft budget President Barack Obama announced in early February, although that money would go to scientific research and robotic missions rather than sending guys back to the moon to look for Alan B. Shepard’s golf balls. (There are two up there: he shanked his first shot and took the rare moon mulligan.)

Chew on this: animal-rights group PETA says life in captivity is too stressful for groundhogs, which should thus be excused from Groundhog Day festivities. In an interview with blogger Rusty Pritchard, Texas Tech University climatologist Katharine Hayhoe noted that human “climate scientists are often subject to stressful conditions as well, as everything from their sanity to their integrity is attacked on a regular basis.”

Here’s another idea that’s really been vexing me. Human embryonic stem cells are bad, I’ve been told, because they come from aborted embryos or from surplus embryos created for in vitro fertilization. And using these cells in potentially lifesaving research is morally wrong because even if that embryo was only a few cells or just one cell, it has the potential to be a human being. To some people’s thinking, it already is a human being. On the other completely gestated hand, what are called induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are allegedly good because no embryos are involved. An iPSC is a tissue-specific adult cell that, with special treatment, has reverted to a fully pluripotent form capable of producing any other kind of cell in the body. In fact, it’s theoretically capable of being implanted into a welcoming womb and developing into a human being. Oh, the result would be a clone and therefore pure evil, but it would definitely be a human. So what I don’t get is why aren’t people who are against using embryonic stem cells in research just as against using iPSCs? Is it because of the evil clone thing?

By the way, freezers in fertility clinics all over the country are filled with those surplus embryos, which some consider to be human beings with all the rights and privileges thereof. And there’s a thought experiment in which a fully developed human baby-type person (that detailed description is meant to ward off semantic issues about who’s a human or what’s a baby) is in the clinic sitting on one of those freezers when a fire breaks out—whom do you save, the crying baby or as many of the frozen embryos as you can? (Hint: if you leave the baby, you don’t get invited to the spaghetti dinner at the thought-experiment firehouse.)

Let’s move on to this item: the first movie filmed entirely by chimps aired in the U.K. in January, the brainchild of a primatology doctoral candidate who gave cameras to said chimps at the Edinburgh Zoo. Inside sources say that an uncredited William Goldman was brought in to fix script problems and that the Weinsteins plugged gaping holes in the funding after initial filming went way over budget on, here it comes, hair and makeup.



6 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. DavidH44 04:47 PM 3/25/10

    Steve, Given your interest in groundhogs, monkeys and babies, I thought this item might stick to your desk:

    Last month two apparently similar bills were introduced in the MA legislature. One passed overwhelmingly; the other was treated as a joke. Each one sought to prohibit performing intrusive, possibly dangerous, medically unnecessary operations on beings who are unable to give informed consent. One proposed to outlaw de-barking procedures on dogs. The other related to circumcision of male babies. Guess which one passed?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. Hayley 10:53 PM 4/9/10

    Hey Steve.

    To comment on the cheetos lip balm, I think it's slightly insane. On the other hand however, our society is so over powered by junk food, sugars, fats you name it that I'm not all that surprised. I am mean why wouldn't you want to have the taste of cheesy grease on you're lips all day? Obesity as most people know is expanding way faster then it ever should, things like this lip balm aren't helping. To switch the idea just slightly, I was watching the news the other day and they we're talking about the new sizes of cups you can now get at starbucks. They were the size of a bucket ( like a kfc bucket) and the size of a double shot glass. I was very puzzled as to why someone would want so much coffee at one time, and more then this, wouldn't they go on caffeine over load? It turns out that this was one of their April fools gags of the day, but honestly sizes like that, in this day and age wouldn't surprise me. I mean there is of course, already cheetos flavored lip balm.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. agenthucky in reply to Hayley 11:15 AM 4/13/10

    It's best if you apply it right after eating Cheetos, that way you seal in the real, fake cheese under the layer of immitation, fake cheese.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. ilsalund 02:24 PM 4/13/10

    I spend most of the workday on the computer and connected to the web. This is the first blog I have voluntarily read from start to finish. Can't wait for more.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. mikid54 06:00 PM 4/14/10

    What an interesting array of things you must see coming across your desk. Mine isn't nearly as interesting as yours. I'm green with envy.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. mikid54 06:03 PM 4/14/10

    The things that come across your desk are so much more interesting those that I see day in and day out. I'm green with envy!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Wonders of Life: Scientific American Magazine

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X