Image: Mark Wragg
-
The Wisdom of Psychopaths
In this engrossing journey into the lives of psychopaths and their infamously crafty behaviors, the renowned psychologist Kevin Dutton reveals that there is a...
Read More »
All our experience of the world, and ability to act on it, are channelled through our body. The pioneering computer scientist, Alan Turing, correctly realised the human mind is special not particularly because of its computing power, but because the body provides it with a unique interface to the world. Current research in psychology and neuroscience is probing how the brain represents the body. Recent advances have revealed that body representation is fundamentally multisensory, arising from the combination of many different sensory signals. These include classical “senses,” such as touch and vision, and also much more specific signals, such as the flexion or extension of each muscle, which define the body’s posture in space. This information is integrated to construct a multisensory representation of the current state of the body. Intriguingly, multisensory signals also affect what we perceive our body to be like, for example by making us feel like a rubber hand really is our hand! Our thoughts about what our body is are highly flexible, and track the multisensory inputs that the brain receives.
A common illustration of just how flexible the sense of our body is comes from changes in the brain’s representation of the body due to tool use. Humans, and some other animals, are able to use tools as additions to the body. When we use a long pole to retrieve an object we couldn’t otherwise reach, the pole becomes, in some sense, an extension of our body. Is this merely a poetic way of speaking, or does the brain actually incorporate the tool into its representation of the body? Studies of monkeys learning to use a rake to obtain distant objects show that this may be more than a mere metaphor. Multisensory brain cells respond both to touch on the hand or visual objects appearing near the hand. When the monkeys used the rake, these cells began to respond to objects appearing anywhere along the length of the tool, suggesting the brain represented the rake as actually being part of the hand.
A recent paper in Psychological Science elegantly illustrates the plasticity of body representation, and provides further evidence that representations of the body really do expand to include ‘external’ objects we hold. Thomas Carlson of the University of Maryland and colleagues at Harvard University and Utrecht University in the Netherlands used an unusual subjective experience of the body first reported by Franklin Taylor of Princeton University in 1941. If you look towards your hand in a darkened room and see it illuminated by a bright flash, an afterimage of your hand remains after the flash. If you then move your hand, the afterimage changes, though no actual visual signal is present. The precise effect, like so much of the richness of human sensation, is difficult to catch in words, but is like a fading, or loss of clarity of the hand. This fading is normally explained by the multisensory nature of body representation: when the hand moves, but the afterimage does not, visual information and ‘proprioceptive’ information from muscles no longer agree about where the hand is. The visual impression of the hand fading may be a by-product of this inability to integrate different sensations due to conflict about where they are in space.
See what we're tweeting about
8 Comments
Add CommentIt's not metaphor... when I ride my dirtbike, it is as much me as my toes are. I feel my knobbie tires gripping the earth the same way I feel pebbles under my feet. This connection is the difference between bumbling along and being "in the zone."
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisI've often wondered how horseback riders feel when they're "in the zone." Is the horse a part of them, or rather do they form some kind of super-organism?
It's not metaphor... when I ride my dirtbike, it is as much me as my toes are. I feel my knobbie tires gripping the earth the same way I feel pebbles under my feet. This connection is the difference between bumbling along and being "in the zone."
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisI've often wondered how horseback riders feel when they're "in the zone." Is the horse a part of them, or rather do they form some kind of super-organism?
fixerdave - I had the same thought about driving cars at high speeds. In this case I'd suggest that the machine is an extension of the human, with senses registering the physical effects imparted to the encompassing device.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisThis information shows the importance of giving children ample opportunity to experience themselves as they handle blocks, art materials, sports equipment, tools of varying kinds and more as they develop a sense of their capabilities in the world.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisI have long been told by friends & family members that I write interesting letters. But the same does not hold true when I'm typing or keying in a letter. The pen in my hand seems to be in direct contact with my brain or thoughts. Does anyone else experience this connection
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisVery interesting. I believe that people can also become an extention of ourselves as can pets, poetry, or art. Even the earth itself can feel as a continuation and connection of onesself.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisI relate directly to the concept at hand as a skier, where the skis become extensions of the feet, 'feeling' the snow and inconsistencies in it, allowing reflexive adaptations to changes in snow and conditions. And I would definitely agree with the concept of a heightened sense of bodily incorporation of tools as athletes or tool-users get more into the zone.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisLittle old lady, I feel that same connection, only in reverse. I can feel the thoughts and ideas flowing as soon as I start typing or keying the words in.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this