A Monster Comes out of Hiding

Researchers solve a long-standing phylogenetic mystery

COURTESY OF SEAN McMAHON Yale University

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In 1955 amateur fossil hunter Francis Tully discovered an exceedingly odd specimen in Mazon Creek, a collecting hotspot near Chicago. Imprinted on Tully's rock were the remains of a tubular creature with stalk eyeballs and a long mouth apparatus terminating in a feature that resembled an alligator clip. Dubbed the Tully monster, the 300-million-year-old specimen later became Illinois's official state fossil. Despite its popularity, though, researchers have made neither heads nor tails of it—until now.

According to findings published in Nature, the organism traces its evolutionary legacy to modern-day lampreys: jawless, bloodsucking fish. Researchers arrived at this conclusion after analyzing 1,200 Tully monster specimens—most about 15 to 20 centimeters long—and realizing that what was previously assumed to be part of the creature's gut is actually a notochord, a primitive backbone. The notochord's downward curvature pointed the team toward lampreys, which also share that physiological quirk.

Victoria McCoy, a paleontologist at the University of Leicester in England who led the study while at Yale University, is not ready to declare the case closed, however. “We still know very little about how the Tully monster lived,” she says. “But we can now use modern lampreys and other fishes as analogues and, we hope, start to better understand the mysterious lifestyle of this ancient monster.”

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe