New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Acid Rain Linked to Bird Decline

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Despite its poor reputation, acid rain has not been thoroughly investigated as a cause of declines in bird populations in North America. Instead, research has focused on factors such as habitat loss and fragmentation. Now scientists have determined that acid rain has a negative influence on the breeding habits of at least one North American songbird species. The findings will be published online this week by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Ralph S. Hames of Cornell University and his colleagues combined data on the breeding behavior and distribution patterns of Wood Thrushes with information regarding acid rain deposition and soil acidity. The researchers then tested for any correlation between the birds' breeding and acid rain intensity, taking into consideration population density, vegetation cover and the effects of habitat fragmentation. According to the team's final model, which includes statistics from 653 sites, the probability of Wood Thrushes attempting to breed decreases as the deposition of ions from acid precipitation increases.

Exactly how the contaminated rain affects the birds remains unclear, although the scientists suggest that diminished levels of calcium in the soil could lower the quality and quantity of available prey or lead to increased uptake of other minerals in toxic doses. The results, the authors conclude, "suggest an important role for acid rain in recent declines of some birds breeding in the eastern United States, particularly in high elevation zones with low pH soils, and show the need to consider other large-scale influences, in addition to habitat fragmentation, when addressing bird population declines."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe