Acid Rain Linked to Bird Decline

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Despite its poor reputation, acid rain has not been thoroughly investigated as a cause of declines in bird populations in North America. Instead, research has focused on factors such as habitat loss and fragmentation. Now scientists have determined that acid rain has a negative influence on the breeding habits of at least one North American songbird species. The findings will be published online this week by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Ralph S. Hames of Cornell University and his colleagues combined data on the breeding behavior and distribution patterns of Wood Thrushes with information regarding acid rain deposition and soil acidity. The researchers then tested for any correlation between the birds' breeding and acid rain intensity, taking into consideration population density, vegetation cover and the effects of habitat fragmentation. According to the team's final model, which includes statistics from 653 sites, the probability of Wood Thrushes attempting to breed decreases as the deposition of ions from acid precipitation increases.

Exactly how the contaminated rain affects the birds remains unclear, although the scientists suggest that diminished levels of calcium in the soil could lower the quality and quantity of available prey or lead to increased uptake of other minerals in toxic doses. The results, the authors conclude, "suggest an important role for acid rain in recent declines of some birds breeding in the eastern United States, particularly in high elevation zones with low pH soils, and show the need to consider other large-scale influences, in addition to habitat fragmentation, when addressing bird population declines."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe