An Ancient Nessie? Long-Neck Dinos Once Prowled Scottish Lagoon

Researchers made the discovery after noticing dinosaur footprints along the Isle of Skye's rocky coast—an area that was a lagoon during the Jurassic

Hundreds of dinosaur footprints and handprints dating to 170 million years ago adorn the shore on the Isle of Skye, making it the largest dinosaur site ever discovered in Scotland, a new study finds.

The discovery proves that dinosaurs—likely long-necked, four-legged, herbivorous sauropods—splashed around Scotland during the Middle Jurassic period, the researchers said.

"These footprints were made in a lagoon, which is a pretty interesting environment for dinosaurs," said study lead researcher Steve Brusatte, a paleontologist at the University of Edinburgh. "We can tell that they were making these footprints while they were walking underwater—probably shallow water." [See Images of the Dinosaur Footprints in Scotland]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The track marks are a serendipitous find. A paleontologist had found the fossilized skeleton of a little crocodile on the Isle of Skye, and a group went to inspect it and look for other prehistoric remains in April. When walking back from the site, where they found a slew of fish bones and shark teeth fossils, they noticed the dinosaur footprints along the rocky coast — an area that was a lagoon during the Jurassic.

The footprints were covered with seaweed and sand, and were about to be covered by the approaching tide. The researchers noted where they were located and took a few pictures of the amazing find, agreeing to return to the site once the tide was out.

"We saw one first and then another, and then we started to see a pattern and it dawned on us," Brusatte told Live Science. "But the tide was coming in then, so we had to come back the next day to measure them more."

A later analysis showed that the track marks were likely made by primitive sauropods. With the largest footprint measuring 2.3 feet (70 centimeters) across, the track marks are simply too big to have been left by any other type of dinosaur, Brusatte said.

Based on the footprints' size, the sauropods measured at least 49 feet (15 meters) long and weighed more than 11 tons (10 metric tons), he added. Moreover, the dinosaur handprints show that they had a "pretty big claw" on their first fingers, possibly for digging in the ground and making nests, Brusatte said.

Tracks were made by sauropod dinosaurs on the Isle of Skye 170 million years ago.
Credit: Steve Brusatte

There is other evidence of sauropods on Scotland—namely, a tailbone, arm bone and a couple of teeth—but these are the first-known sauropod tracks in Scotland, the researchers said. Because animals and natural elements can move bones and teeth, but not track marks, the new find offers unwavering evidence that sauropods once lived in ancient Scotland, they said.

Brusatte and his colleagues found at least three layers of footprints in the rocks, meaning that multiple generations of huge sauropods walked through the ancient, saltwater lagoon. The location suggests that some sauropod species "were at home near the water or even in shallow water," not just on dry land, he said.

The finding is also exciting because fossils from the Middle Jurassic are rare. However, there is more evidence of Middle Jurassic sauropods south of Scotland in England, where there are track marks and fossils, the researchers said. [Images: Denali National Park's Amazing Dinosaur Tracks]

"It is exhilarating to make such a discovery and being able to study it in detail, but the best thing is this is only the tip of the iceberg," Tom Challands, a teaching fellow in the School of GeoSciences at the University of Edinburgh, said in a statement. "I'm certain Skye will keep yielding great sites and specimens for years to come."

The researchers hope to get more funding so that they can do an aerial survey with a technique called LIDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) that will help them map the track marks. Once they have a comprehensive diagram of the prints, they'll be able to determine about how fast the paelo-beasts were moving, though the track marks are close together, so the dinos were likely moving slowly, Brusatte said.

The findings were published today (Dec. 1) in the Scottish Journal of Geology.

Copyright 2015 LiveScience, a Purch company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

LiveScience is one of the biggest and most trusted popular science websites operating today, reporting on the latest discoveries, groundbreaking research and fascinating breakthroughs that impact you and the wider world.

More by LiveScience

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe