Animals Have Personalities, Too—Which Fade Away in Group Situations

The persona of some fishes bends to conform to group dynamics, but it ultimately remains constant

Thomas Fuchs

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

As any pet owner will tell you, humans aren't the only animals with personalities. And it isn't just dogs and cats. In recent years scientists have found that members of many species, from hermit crabs to rats to fish, have unique dispositions, demonstrating consistent behavioral differences over time and across varying situations.

But how do social situations affect individual personalities? University of Bristol biologist Christos C. Ioannou and his colleagues sought to find out by turning to a small fish called the three-spined stickleback, which inhabits brackish coastal waters throughout the Northern Hemisphere. “They're found both as individuals and in social groups in the wild,” making them perfect for personality assessments across different settings, Ioannou says.

The researchers took 80 fish and placed each under a protective cover at one end of a tank. At the opposite end was some food. Crossing the tank to feed would seem risky to the sticklebacks because open water typically exposes them to the threat of predation.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Each fish behaved consistently over several days. Bolder ones quickly left the safety of the refuge to go for the food. Timid ones took longer to emerge and swam across the tank more cautiously. But when 10 sticklebacks were placed under the cover together, each fish's individual persona faded away. As with humans, the bolder individuals served as group leaders—albeit careful ones. “The first individuals come out relatively quickly, but it almost looks like they realize they're not being followed and so wait for others to catch up with them,” Ioannou says. When separated from the group later on, the fish regained their original personalities. The results were published in September in Science Advances.

The new findings suggest that group dynamics tamp down individual personalities, and the researchers say it is the first time that such suppression has been explicitly linked to an underlying cause: the need to conform when faced with a risky decision.

Animal personality researchers have historically focused on individuals while ignoring the way they behave in groups, and collective behavior researchers have focused on groups while downplaying individual differences, according to University of St. Andrews animal behavior researcher Mike Webster, who was not involved in the work. “What this study really does is bring those two streams of research together,” showing that animal personalities are flexible yet also persistent, he says.

Jason G. Goldman is a science journalist based in Los Angeles. He has written about animal behavior, wildlife biology, conservation, and ecology for Scientific American, Los Angeles magazine, the Washington Post, the Guardian, the BBC, Conservation magazine, and elsewhere. He contributes to Scientific American's "60-Second Science" podcast, and is co-editor of Science Blogging: The Essential Guide (Yale University Press). He enjoys sharing his wildlife knowledge on television and on the radio, and often speaks to the public about wildlife and science communication.

More by Jason G. Goldman
Scientific American Magazine Vol 315 Issue 6This article was published with the title “One's True Nature” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 315 No. 6 (), p. 24
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1216-24

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe