Antibiotic Use and Resistance Rise Dramatically

New report provides the most comprehensive picture yet of antibiotic use and resistance worldwide, and it isn't pretty

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Antibiotic use is growing steadily worldwide, driven mainly by rising demand in low- and middle-income countries, according to a report released on September 17. The research presents the clearest picture yet of how and where the drugs are used, and the prevalence of different types of antibiotic resistance.

The Center for Disease Dynamics, Economics and Policy (CDDEP), a non-profit group headquartered in Washington DC, based the analysis on data from scientific literature and national and regional surveillance systems. The organization used this to calculate and map the rate of antibiotic resistance for 12 types of bacteria in 39 countries, and trends in antibiotic use in 69 countries over the past 10 years or longer.

Global antibiotic consumption grew by 30% between 2000 and 2010. This growth is driven mostly by countries such as South Africa and India, where antibiotics are widely available over the counter and sanitation in some areas is poor.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In India, for instance, the number of Klebsiella pneumoniaeinfections that are resistant to a class of powerful antibiotics called carbapenems doubled from 29% in 2008 to 57% in 2014. By contrast, fewer than 10% of K. pneumoniae infections in the United States and Europe are carbapenem resistant.

The report also found that the use of antibiotics in livestock is growing worldwide. The problem is particularly acute in China, which used about 15,000 tons of antibiotics for this purpose in 2010; the country is projected to double its consumption by 2030.

Credit: Nature

Strategies to strive for
Most high-income countries, by contrast, have begun instituting regulations on antibiotic use, and these are starting to pay off. According to the report, the number of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections, for example, has dropped precipitously in many areas, such as the United Kingdom, over the past eight years.

“I think it’s a very thorough and thought-provoking report,” says Daniel Sahm, chief scientific officer at International Health Management Associates in Schaumburg, Illinois. Because it is so difficult to gather data from developing countries, he says, the information used in the new analysis might contain holes: an argument for more-aggressive surveillance.

The report lists six steps for preventing antibiotic resistance in countries that do not yet have good policies. Some of those measures, such as improving sanitation, are obvious, whereas policies that restrict antibiotic use in agriculture and hospitals might be more difficult or controversial to implement.

But Timothy Walsh, a medical microbiologist at Cardiff University, UK, says that, although the suggestions offered are worthwhile, international cooperation in setting up a global surveillance network and regulations is necessary to limit the overuse of antibiotics. “We can pour as much money and sentiment and goodwill into the front end of the problem as we want,” he says. “But unless we start to have international action and accountability, we’re going to just keep on making the same mistakes over and over again.”

This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on September 17, 2015.

Sara Reardon is a freelance biomedical journalist based in Bozeman, Mont. She is a former staff reporter at Nature, New Scientist and Science and has a master’s degree in molecular biology.

More by Sara Reardon

First published in 1869, Nature is the world's leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-reviewed research that drives ground-breaking discovery, and is read by thought-leaders and decision-makers around the world.

More by Nature magazine

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe