Astronomers Indirectly Spot Neutrinos Released Just 1 Second after the Birth of the Universe

The cosmic neutrino background could provide more details about the universe as it once was

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The universe's oldest light hasn't made a pit stop for 13.82 billion years—beginning its journey just 380,000 years after the big bang. That light, the so-called cosmic microwave background (CMB), serves as a familiar hunting ground for astronomers who seek to understand the universe in its infancy. Unfortunately, it also obscures what lies beyond it: the first hundreds of thousands of years of the universe. Now astronomers think they have peeked beyond even the CMB by capturing evidence of neutrinos traveling since the cosmos was just a second old.

Neutrinos, fundamental particles with no electric charge and very little mass, escaped from the big bang nearly immediately. Their elusive nature allows them to slip through almost all physical barriers, rarely interacting with normal matter. On the rare occasions that they bump into photons, however, they alter the particles' temperatures ever so slightly. It was this temperature shift that astronomers from the University of California, Davis, recently noticed in maps of the CMB produced by the European Space Agency's Planck satellite. They describe this “cosmic neutrino background” in a recent paper published in the journal Physical Review Letters.

Models of the big bang predicted the cosmic neutrino background decades ago, but this indirect observation is the most robust yet. The discovery “gives us a new window on the universe,” says Lawrence M. Krauss, co-director of the Cosmology Initiative at Arizona State University, who was not involved with the study. The detection also constrains properties of neutrinos, which are by far the strangest beasts in the particle zoo. For example, it proves that neutrinos cannot interact with themselves, like many other particles do. If they could, they would leave different signatures within the CMB than those observed.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Further detections of these primordial neutrinos may explain why there are far more particles of matter in the universe than antimatter particles.* The asymmetry was produced in the early universe, and experts think neutrinos had something to do with it, if only because they are so mysterious. “Because we know less about neutrinos, you can be more creative with the kinds of physics you introduce,” the study's co-author Lloyd Knox says. Although these particles are incredibly difficult to detect directly, Knox anticipates that hints from cosmological observations will help solve many neutrino puzzles—and therefore provide a more revealing peek of the universe as it once was.

Editor's Note (1/26/16): This sentence from the print article was edited after it was posted online. The original misstated the universe's matter–antimatter ratio. 

Shannon Hall is an award-winning freelance science journalist based in the Rocky Mountains. She specializes in writing about astronomy, geology and the environment.

More by Shannon Hall
Scientific American Magazine Vol 313 Issue 6This article was published with the title “The Big Bang's Particle Glow” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 313 No. 6 (), p. 25
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1215-25

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe