Banish Procrastination by Thinking Differently about Deadlines

Trick your brain into meeting any due date

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

What makes some tasks harder than others to tackle? It turns out the time allotted for the work matters less than how our mind perceives the deadline. When a deadline feels like it is part of the present—say, falling within the current calendar month—we are more likely to begin the task.

In one experiment, researchers asked 100 undergraduates when they would start a data-entry task that they had five days to complete. For some, the hypothetical assignment started April 24 or 25, whereas others got the job April 26 or 27. Although the groups had the same amount of time, the students with a deadline in early May were less willing to begin the task right away, according to the study, which appeared in the Journal of Consumer Research.

An experiment involving 295 farmers in India had a similar outcome. At a finance lecture, the farmers learned they could earn a monetary benefit if they opened a bank account and saved a certain amount within six months. One group's six-month deadline landed in December, another group's in January. Farmers whose deadline came before year's end were more likely to open the account immediately and more likely to meet the six-month savings goal.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The findings illustrate how the brain divides time into discrete categories, with boundaries at the end of a month or the start of a new year, for instance. To motivate yourself to start a task you are putting off, try thinking about time boundaries differently. For a deadline next month, you might call it three weeks instead—or design a new calendar for yourself that does not break up the months. The researchers also suggest dividing a task into incremental steps with their own deadlines, which will feel more immediate.

Esther Landhuis is a journalist in the San Francisco Bay Area. She holds a Ph.D. in immunology and covers biomedicine in all dimensions, from bench discoveries to biotech in health care.

More by Esther Landhuis
SA Mind Vol 26 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Procrastination” in SA Mind Vol. 26 No. 1 (), p. 9
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0115-9a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe