New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Best-Selling Science Books

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Ever wondered why a book like Carl Sagan's Cosmos sold 900,000 copies in its 50 weeks on the Publishers Weekly best-seller list, but Rachel Carson's Silent Spring, which helped start the environmental movement, didn't? Cornell University professor Bruce Lewenstein gave a simple answer¿marketing¿on Monday at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. "An author's style and personality and the presence he or she brings to a best-selling science book are generally the main factors in making it a bestseller," Lewenstein says. "The prominence of a science book author's personality has grown in the past 20 years."

What has grown, too, is the sheer number of science books that become bestsellers or win the Pulitzer Prize. Indeed, only two science books had won the Pulitzer before 1978, when Sagan and David C. Duncan co-authored the prize-winning Dragons of Eden. During the next 20 years, though, 12 other titles¿among them Douglas Hofstadter's Godel, Escher, Bach and Jared Diamond's Guns, Germs, and Steel¿won the prestigious award. In general, Lewenstein notes that nonspecialist general readers are more likely to pick up bestsellers, whereas scientists or those with a close interest lean more toward influential titles, regardless of sales. See which ones below that you've read.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe