Best-Selling Science Books

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Ever wondered why a book like Carl Sagan's Cosmos sold 900,000 copies in its 50 weeks on the Publishers Weekly best-seller list, but Rachel Carson's Silent Spring, which helped start the environmental movement, didn't? Cornell University professor Bruce Lewenstein gave a simple answer¿marketing¿on Monday at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. "An author's style and personality and the presence he or she brings to a best-selling science book are generally the main factors in making it a bestseller," Lewenstein says. "The prominence of a science book author's personality has grown in the past 20 years."

What has grown, too, is the sheer number of science books that become bestsellers or win the Pulitzer Prize. Indeed, only two science books had won the Pulitzer before 1978, when Sagan and David C. Duncan co-authored the prize-winning Dragons of Eden. During the next 20 years, though, 12 other titles¿among them Douglas Hofstadter's Godel, Escher, Bach and Jared Diamond's Guns, Germs, and Steel¿won the prestigious award. In general, Lewenstein notes that nonspecialist general readers are more likely to pick up bestsellers, whereas scientists or those with a close interest lean more toward influential titles, regardless of sales. See which ones below that you've read.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe