New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Bigger Storm Waves of Climate Change Bust Up and Melt Sea Ice

Bigger ocean waves might be more common nowadays as climate change alters wind patterns

Big ocean waves whipped up by storms hundreds or even thousands of miles away from Earth’s poles could play a bigger role in breaking up polar sea ice and thus contributing to its melt more than had been thought, a new study suggests.

The study, detailed in the May 29 issue of the journal Nature, found that these waves penetrate further into the fields of sea ice around Antarctica than current models would suggest, breaking up the ice well away from the edge of the ice. And previous studies have suggested that bigger waves might be more common near the ice edges at both poles as climate change alters wind patterns.

Incorporating this information into models could help scientists better predict the patterns of retreat and expansion seen in the sea ice in both Antarctica and the Arctic — patterns that are at least partly related to the effects of climate change — the researchers say.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The Sea Ice Situation
Sea ice is, as its name would suggest, frozen ocean water; it differs from icebergs, glaciers and their floating tongues called ice shelves, which all originate on land. Sea ice grows in the winter months, and wanes as summer’s warmth causes it to melt. The amount of ice present can influence the movement of ocean currents — on average, about 9.7 million square miles of the ocean is covered with sea ice, according to the U.S. National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC).

Warming in the Arctic, which is progressing at a faster rate than for the planet as a whole, has fueled steep reductions in sea ice, causing it to both thin and retreat. In Antarctica, the picture has been more complicated, with some areas seeing retreat and others sea ice growth, which is potentially linked to the changes in atmospheric wind patterns that the ozone hole has caused. While models have caught the long-term trends in sea ice extent, they’ve been fairly poor at capturing the major deviations from those trends that can happen year-to-year and in different regions.

Researchers in Australia and New Zealand wanted to see how the action of big waves — defined as those with a height of at least 3 meters (about 10 feet) — might play a role in influencing the patterns of retreat and expansion, and if they could help improve the reliability of sea ice models.

No one had measured the propagation of large waves through sea ice before, because, as study lead author Alison Kohout, of New Zealand’s National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, said, “it’s really difficult.” The sea ice is in some of the most remote regions on the planet, and icebreaker ships must be used to plow through the thick ice.

‘Incredible’ voyage
Kohout and her colleagues went on a two-month ocean voyage to drop five buoys onto the sea ice that could measure the waves as they passed. It is thought that the ice behaves elastically as the waves pass through, bending with the wave peaks and troughs, weakening, and eventually breaking.

For someone who had spent years studying the interaction of sea ice and waves on dry land, the opportunity to be in the field, “to actually see it, and to actually see waves” and the waves breaking up the ice was “quite incredible,” Kohout told Climate Central.

What the team found was that the big waves weren’t losing energy as quickly as smaller waves, allowing them to penetrate much deeper into the ice field and break up the ice there. That exposes more of the ice to the ocean, potentially causing more rapid melt and pushing back the edge of the sea ice.

The researchers also compared observed positions of the sea ice edge with modeled wave heights in the Southern Ocean from 1997 to 2009 and found a good match between the waves and the patterns of retreat and expansions: More big waves matched sea ice retreat and vice versa.

“We just think that might be able to help understand this regional variability around Antarctica,” Kohout said.

Kohout and other researchers agree that more work needs to be done to fully understand how waves might be influencing sea ice. For example, not enough data exists to examine the relationships in the Arctic.

The study was also limited in what it tells researchers because it only looked at smaller ice floes, said the NSIDC’s Julienne Stroeve, who was not involved in the study. “It's an interesting study, but I suppose I would like to see how this would impact on breaking large ice floes into smaller ones since that's one way that swell penetrating into the ice pack could help to facilitate more melt,” Stroeve said in an email.

Kohout and her colleagues are planning another expedition in a couple of years, and are working to better understand just why big waves don’t dissipate as fast as smaller waves, she said.

This article is reproduced with permission from Climate Central. The article was first published on May 28, 2014.

Andrea Thompson is senior editor for Earth and environment at Scientific American, covering the environment, energy and Earth sciences. She has been covering these topics for nearly two decades. Prior to joining Scientific American, she was a senior writer covering climate science at Climate Central and a reporter and editor at Live Science, where she primarily covered earth science and the environment. She has moderated panels, including as part of the United Nations Sustainable Development Media Zone, and appeared in radio and television interviews on major networks. She holds a graduate degree in science, health and environmental reporting from New York University, as well as a B.S. and an M.S. in atmospheric chemistry from the Georgia Institute of Technology. Follow Thompson on Bluesky @andreatweather.bsky.social

More by Andrea Thompson

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe