Border Bias and Our Perception of Risk

Our mental maps of risk and safety rely too heavily on imaginary boundaries

Such irrational risk assessment has practical implications, the scientists note. Most obviously, disaster warnings would be much more effective if they emphasized actual distance rather than abstract political demarcations. Tornadoes and hurricanes and other perilous weather formations do not honor state lines. But in addition, citizens would be able to make better decisions about insurance coverage if they were given more meaningful information about the proximity of risk. Finally, citizen activism could be more rationally organized. Oftentimes residents will protest toxic waste dumps and other health threats only within their state borders, feeling immune to identical risks that are in neighboring states but even closer by. Understanding border bias could lead to more sensible and effective citizenship.

(Further Reading)

  • Border Bias: The Belief That State Borders Can Protect against Disasters. Arul Mishra and Himanshu Mishra in Psychological Science. Published online October 13, 2010.

This article was originally published with the title "We're Only Human: Border Bias."

or subscribe to access other articles from the March 2011 publication.
Digital Issue $7.95
Digital Subscription $19.99 Subscribe
Share this Article:


You must sign in or register as a member to submit a comment.

Starting Thanksgiving

Enter code: HOLIDAY 2015
at checkout

Get 20% off now! >


Email this Article