New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Brain-Scan Cell Mystery Solved

Scientists unmask cells that make functional MRI possible

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Since its discovery in the early 1990s, functional MRI has been the basis for more than 19,000 studies of the living, working brain. The technique allows scientists an unprecedented glimpse of the brain regions that are most active during particular tasks or states of mind, but it does not do so directly: the scans measure blood flow, which seems to increase around neurons that are firing. Neurons are not directly connected to blood vessels, however, so until now the mechanism underlying fMRI’s robust success has been a mystery.

Now a team from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology reveals that the support cells dubbed astrocytes (because of their star-shaped bodies) form the link between neurons and blood vessels, as reported in the July 7 issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The neuroscientists used a technique called two-photon microscopy, which harnesses light particles to image very small structures, to observe cells in ferrets’ brains. As the animals were shown different animated graphics, neurons responded within milliseconds, and astrocytes became active seconds later—matching the time delay that neuroimagers have long known accompanies blood flow to active brain regions. When the M.I.T. team blocked astrocyte function, the ferrets’ neurons fired as usual, but blood flow did not increase.

When researchers use fMRI, co-author Mriganka Sur explains, “we are really measuring astrocyte activation. Thus, anything that influences astrocytes is likely to influence fMRI.” This finding could add a layer of complexity to the interpretation of fMRI scans, because astrocytes may be subject to a different set of genetic and environ­mental influences than neurons are. But the more re­searchers understand about what is really happening when the brain “lights up” in an fMRI scan, the better they will be able to use the technology to learn about human cognition.

Note: This article was originally printed with the title, "Brain-Scan Mystery Solved".

SA Mind Vol 19 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Perspectives: Speaking of Memory” in SA Mind Vol. 19 No. 5 (), p. 16
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind1008-16

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe