Can We Keep Airplanes Safe without Killing So Many Birds?

Is slaughtering birds the best way to keep the wildlife away from airplanes?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

In 2012, on the flat, grassy grounds of John F. Kennedy International Airport, wildlife-control agents killed 10,123 birds. The species “depredated” at JFK, which lies just northeast of the Jamaica Bay Wildlife refuge in the New York City borough of Queens, included thousands of gulls, hundreds of starlings and mourning doves, and a smattering of more majestic species such as ospreys and the American kestrel. The long-running JFK depredation program is just one of many efforts around the globe to prevent dangerous, expensive collisions between birds and aircraft.

Perhaps modern forensic tools could lead to a less deadly approach. The DNA found in carcasses of birds killed by aircraft illuminates new ways to control wildlife at airports, a team of Australian scientists suggests.

The forensic investigation began with a call from airport employees in Perth to Michael Bunce, then at Murdoch University. “Look, we've got an entire freezer full of birds,” he recalls airport staffers telling him. “Do you want them?” Soon he and his colleagues had 77 bird carcasses to work with.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The researchers began scooping out the contents of the birds' digestive tracts and sequencing the DNA. In a 2013 study published in Investigative Genetics, Bunce and his colleagues matched the genetic sequences with known species of mice, crayfish and grasshoppers, as well as various grasses.

Such genetic analyses could inform how ground crews manage an airport's ecology to deter birds. “If there's available food for them, what do you do?” Bunce says. “Are you better off netting off waterways, poisoning for rodents or applying insecticides?” In Perth, his findings led the airport to install netting in waterways to control an invasive mosquito fish. Even if such research stops only one or two bird strikes, Bunce says, “it pays for itself many times over.”

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe