How Cancers Grow [Video]

Researchers believe at least six key things have to go wrong for most tumors to develop

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A little more than a dozen years ago two researchers came up with a way of thinking about how tumors grow that changed the way most of the scientific community considered the hundred or more different diseases we call cancer. The varied and complex ways that normal cells become malignant, Douglas Hanahan and Robert Weinberg famously wrote in 2000, could be divided into six main steps—ranging from dividing uncontrollably to avoiding self-destruction. Developing treatments that targeted those essential processes should make cancer therapy much more predictable and effective, they argued.

Things did not turn out quite that way, as George Johnson wrote in the November 2013 issue of Scientific American. If anything, researchers have since learned that the various cellular pathways and molecular signals that prompt an otherwise normal cell to become malignant are even more complicated than they already thought. But Hanahan and Weinberg’s original insight still holds up pretty well as a general way of understanding the underlying process. Douglas Hanahan talks about the six original hallmarks and possibly two new additions in the following video, which was filmed at the 2012 meeting of the European Society for Medical Oncology in Vienna.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Video courtesy of the European Journal of Cancer

Christine Gorman is a health and science writer.

More by Christine Gorman
Scientific American Magazine Vol 309 Issue 5This article was published with the title “How Cancers Grow [Video]” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 309 No. 5 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican112013-7nN8ihhvmedsXKaY27vGPd

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe