Cannibal Spiders May Have Poor Impulse Control

Some female wolf spiders prioritize food over sex

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Spider courtship is a risky business. In some species, females routinely decide that they would rather eat a male than mate with him, and researchers have struggled for decades to understand why. A recent experiment with a type of Spanish wolf spider suggests that the reason may depend on the spider's personality.

A virgin spider cannot be sure how many chances she will have to mate. Every male could be her last, and if she eats all of them, she will never reproduce. Why would a spider take this risk? One possibility is that females are choosy, holding out for large, healthy males with good genes and devouring the rest. Another possibility is the aggressive spillover hypothesis, which suggests that some females have strong predatory instincts that spill over into aggression toward potential mates. These females might eat males even when they would be better off mating with them.

To learn more about cannibalistic spiders, researchers at the Experimental Station of Arid Zones in Spain and their colleagues caught 80 juvenile females of the species Lycosa hispanica—a type of wolf spider—and fed them as much as they wanted while they matured. Some females put on weight more quickly than others. “Since all females had similar prey availability, we estimated that female growth rate would be the result of female voraciousness,” says Rubén Rabaneda-Bueno, the study's lead author.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


After each female molted to adulthood, the researchers placed a male in her enclosure. Females that ate their suitors were offered additional chances with new males. Most of the cannibal females were choosy. They ate males that were in poor condition and mated with males that were of high quality. “But we found that there were a few females that would consistently get a male and kill it and get another male and kill it—so they were really aggressive,” says Jordi Moya-Laraño, the study's senior author.

The most aggressive females killed big, healthy males as often as they killed scrawny ones. The same females also had the highest growth rates, indicating that they were the most aggressive toward prey. “In this study, a female personality trait—her voracity toward prey—was correlated with her aggressiveness toward males,” Rabaneda-Bueno says. “Our results provide evidence that different female personalities can lead to different outcomes in the interactions between males and females in a sexual cannibal.”

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe