Celestial Sunscreen Dims Stars

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Images: DAVID AGUILAR, HARVARD-SMITHSONIAN CENTER FOR ASTROPHYSICS

Scientists have discovered why some stars dim and seem to temporarily disappear, a new study suggests. According to a report to be published in the April 1 issue of the Astrophysical Journal, light-absorbing chemicals form in the atmosphere of these so-called Mira variable stars, causing them to dim to one thousandth of their maximum brightness--and temporarily vanish from view.

Many stars change their brightness to a small degree because of pulsations--like those of a beating heart--that cause the star to alternately contract (and grow hotter) and expand (and cool). Such pulsations, however, can account for brightness changes up to a factor of only 50, a fraction of those displayed by Mira variable stars. In fact, these stars emit so little optical light that they seem to the human eye to disappear.

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

In an attempt to explain the vanishing stars, astronomers first postulated in 1933 that light-absorbing metal oxides could form in their surrounding atmospheres. But because of the limitations in computing power available at the time, they could not substantiate their claims. Now Mark Reid and Joshua Goldston of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics have confirmed that titanium oxide--a chemical commonly used in sunscreen--forms in the atmosphere of these stars, thereby increasing its opacity. As a result, light from the innermost (and hottest) regions of the star is absorbed and only light from the cooler outer layers reaches observers on Earth. (The images at right represent an artist's conception of a Mira variable star at its maximum brightness (top) and its minimum (bottom). Says Reid, "That dimming is like exchanging a bank of stadium lights for a single nightlight."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American